Infosys’ BPM-EAI blog offers a platform to discuss the latest trends in the Business Process Management and Enterprise Application Integration spaces. Exchange thoughts, ideas and opinions with Infosys experts on how BPM and EAI programs can be leveraged to achieve operational excellence and maximize your return on investment.

« April 2009 | Main | June 2009 »

May 26, 2009

Emergence of the new CIO

Few weeks back, business card of one of my clients caught my attention – the designation read as Chief Integration Officer ("CIO")! This goes on to demonstrate that integration platforms of enterprises have started seeing the need for dedicated attention from a CXO designate. Incidentally, two weeks later, during my panel discussion at "Connection 2009", similar view points were echoed by my fellow panel members - Ken Vollmer (of Forrester), Mark Zrna (of Orica) and Lowell Gilvin (of Jabil Circuit). The panel, moderated by Chris Johnson from Sterling Commerce, agreed that integration platform has taken a role of paramount importance in companies and has is no longer seen as just another ‘infrastructure’ element; this sentiment reflects analysts’ opinion that integration has catapulted into top-5 priorities of CIOs. This has led to evolution of a special role of “Chief Integration Officer” who is now responsible and accountable for the integration strategy in the enterprise.

In last decade, multiple concepts like business process management (BPM), cloud computing, business intelligence, service oriented architecture, etc have flourished under the aegis of integration space. It is important that companies invest in creating “Integration Competency Centers” (or ICC) to realize maximum value out of their integration investments. ICC should be entrusted to create the integration strategy aligned with the company’s IT strategy which in turn should align with business priorities. Emergence of roles like CIO ensures that the governance of such ICCs gets dedicated CXO level sponsorship within the enterprise. We have seen our clients believe that it makes best sense to have all the BPM, BI, Cloud Computing, and SOA initiatives with the integration teams.

Another interesting point that emerged during the panel discussion was the acceptance of federated integration infrastructure by the clients. While it was earlier believed that clients will migrate completely to ERP-package based integration suites (like Oracle Fusion or SAP PI) over a period of time, it has been found that clients today are maybe not comfortable with ‘all eggs in one basket’ approach and instead are opting for federated integration architecture; this approach has led to need and thereby creation of inter-operable ESBs. ICCs under the CIOs provide the right combination of governance and architecture set up to ensure the success of best of breed approach. I believe that Sterling’s Business Integration Suite (BIS) could be seen as one of the pure-play ESB options by clients in their federated integration infrastructure.

The launch of Sterling’s Business Integration Suite (BIS) was one of the highlights of Connection 2009. With this product launch, Sterling tries to spread its reach beyond B2B (one of the leaders) into core EAI. If Sterling has to succeed in a federated environment, CIOs can be reached out as one of the early adopters of their BIS offerings. Having provided consulting and implementation services to customers on the Sterling’s GIS and Gentran products for many years now, we will be interested to see how Sterling evolves as an EAI vendor in an organic fashion.  "Connection 2010" will show the extent to which Sterling BIS has been able to stamp its presence in the EAI space, and I look forward to it!

So, next time you see CIO as a designation on a business card, have a careful look again, it might be the Chief Integration Officer you are in company with!

May 10, 2009

BPM In Government: A key enabler for Citizen friendly service delivery : Part II

As I had mentioned in my previous post on this topic, governments and public sector are increasingly become a key target users of BPM related technologies. Though I am still looking for hard data to back this up, my experience with the customers and noise levels in BPM community surely indicate towards this trend. So I was not surprised when I saw a mail in my Inbox last week from WfMC (Work Flow Management Council) announcing their theme for their much awaited annual BPM and Workflow handbook and the theme was ‘Spotlight on Government’!

 

In this post, I would like to share some of my thoughts on key areas where BPM can help governments achieve improved efficiency and service levels. Following areas come to mind in today’s context.

1. Compliance enforcement (both internal compliance as well compliance by external entities). I had got some feedback on my earlier post on this point and am inclined to add this as point # 1.  

2. Service consolidation in form of ‘Single e-window’ for citizen facing services. I have experienced this first hand during my stay in Dubai. See http://www.dubai.ae/en.portal 

3. Application of Rule based straight through processing for high volume transactions such as Tax returns and converting them from workflow based to rules driven automated processes. 

As governments adopt BPM starting from focused, small scale experiments and then trying to scale up to a larger scale, cross agency deployments, they are likely to face certain adoption challenges. Some of them we have seen already in play, many of them will emerge with time. Ones that I have experienced are:

1. Development and nurturing of skills and competencies required to manage the process lifecycle (and achieve continuous improvement).

2. Managing the impact of BPM on structure and roles & responsibilities.

3. Uniformity and consistency in terms of process modelling conventions, methodologies, tools and templates across agencies and departments.

4. Master data integration and consistency across departments. The Master data problem assumes new dimensions when we talk about entire populations of nation as target users. 

5. Architectural governance.

6. Managing dependencies and process model reuse


Do share your views on what challenges you have come across while implementing BPM in government. I look forward to them.

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Infosys on Twitter