Infosys’ BPM-EAI blog offers a platform to discuss the latest trends in the Business Process Management and Enterprise Application Integration spaces. Exchange thoughts, ideas and opinions with Infosys experts on how BPM and EAI programs can be leveraged to achieve operational excellence and maximize your return on investment.

Main

March 02, 2010

Struggling with adoption of Shared Integration Services in your organization? Welcome to 'Change Management'

I'm not very fond of putting ‘ change management’ in my title. It’s such a cliché and not sure if organizations really trust something like this even though everyone understands what this is about. But life is not fair, not to the extent we all like and world of Integration is even more unfair (ask your Integration lead and they will tell you the stories). Just couple of months back, I was having very intense discussion with a CIO of one of the major retail businesses on the topic of IT shared services, and issue on hand was the frustration that this gentleman was going through because of not being able to generate interest and motivation in larger IT organization community as well as business units to go shared service way. While on his interest part, his direct career and credibility as a leader was at stake, more importantly, it nullified lot of effort and investment that was made to conceptualize, design and build the shared service entity.

And this has not been the only unique or isolated story that I have come across. Specially with rapidly changing and evolving IT organizations, this has been a common struggle to break the current mindset and conventional working patterns and move the entire organization toward a new way of doing things. It typically will involve the business app teams, infrastructure team, business owners and managers, vendors and all other parts of the eco-system that are involved in making service delivery work.

Continue reading "Struggling with adoption of Shared Integration Services in your organization? Welcome to 'Change Management'" »

September 15, 2009

Getting Started with an Integration Competency Center (ICC) – Part 1

So one has heard about Integration Competency Center (ICC), read analyst briefs on it and understood another three letter acronym. But the questions still lingers in the back of the mind “How do I figure out if we need an ICC”? “We are already doing integration projects and doing Ok, so how do I sell this idea internally” OR “We know things are not working well for us in integration projects and there are issues, but where do we make a start?”. If you empathize with this situation (and it is a common one based on what we hear from our prospects), read on. In this blog series, I will share my thoughts on challenges and approaches when it comes to handling the most critical phase in your ICC journey ‘Getting started with it”. This phase will mostly involve envisioning, business case creation, internal selling, evangelization and roadmap development. 

Continue reading "Getting Started with an Integration Competency Center (ICC) – Part 1" »

June 23, 2009

What's next for Integration Competency Centers - Part 6

In this blog segment, we will explore the sourcing options that are available today to the enterprises for strengthening and scaling the ICC service capabilities. Many of the enterprises that might have the ICC organization/set up in some shape or form,  don't really leverage high-maturity sourcing models. Core thinking behind a strategic sourcing model is to find a sourcing arrangement that allows the enterprise to channel their investments and energies into driving business results while bulk of the ‘doing’ and ‘making it happen’ work is sourced from where it makes best sense.

Continue reading "What's next for Integration Competency Centers - Part 6" »

June 19, 2009

Business Value Innovation in B2B space - Part 1

 B2B or the collaborative business partnership is transforming. Most of it can be attributed to great deal of opportunities emerging owing to new business models and economic influences. So B2B as a space in the enterprise business eco-system is becoming the convergence point for Business and IT to jointly create best business value in the global market place.

This transformation (that is going on and will continue in the future) is what this blogging series is going to be focused on. And to make it little more interesting, I’m adding slight complexity here, bring ‘value’ perspective as the core. So net net, we will look into a structure thought process for creating value in B2B space as the transformation is taking place. I believe it will be of great help to senior executives of enterprises that are charged with the responsibility of taking their B2B capability to next level.

Continue reading "Business Value Innovation in B2B space - Part 1" »

June 08, 2009

"What's Next" for Integration Competency Centers? - Part 5

Another important shift that can be brought into ICC is the clear identification of the value added functions and 'operational' functions. This will help, one to automate, standardize and accelerate the operational functions; secondly, it will give opportunity to channel the investments into thought leadership and innovation effort more toward value added functions. One of the strongest feature of such ICC will be availability of 'self-service' capabilities in many facets of the ICC.

Continue reading ""What's Next" for Integration Competency Centers? - Part 5" »

May 26, 2009

Emergence of the new CIO

Few weeks back, business card of one of my clients caught my attention – the designation read as Chief Integration Officer ("CIO")! This goes on to demonstrate that integration platforms of enterprises have started seeing the need for dedicated attention from a CXO designate. Incidentally, two weeks later, during my panel discussion at "Connection 2009", similar view points were echoed by my fellow panel members - Ken Vollmer (of Forrester), Mark Zrna (of Orica) and Lowell Gilvin (of Jabil Circuit). The panel, moderated by Chris Johnson from Sterling Commerce, agreed that integration platform has taken a role of paramount importance in companies and has is no longer seen as just another ‘infrastructure’ element; this sentiment reflects analysts’ opinion that integration has catapulted into top-5 priorities of CIOs. This has led to evolution of a special role of “Chief Integration Officer” who is now responsible and accountable for the integration strategy in the enterprise.

Continue reading "Emergence of the new CIO" »

April 13, 2009

Consolidating Integration – mandatory or optional?

For someone who was not in touch with the application integration industry, the term “Consolidating Integration” may have sounded pleonastic. Well, not in today’s tough economic situation for anyone in the IT industry. A few years back, the thought of Consolidating Integration should not have surfaced in any one’s mind. Well, the entire idea of Integration was to “integrate” disparate systems. And theoretically, it would have made common sense to adopt one tool for integration – the purpose was just “Integration”.

Continue reading "Consolidating Integration – mandatory or optional?" »

April 09, 2009

"What's next" for Integration Competency Centers? - Part 4

I believe, in the next-generation view of the ICC, a key area of focus will be  'adoption of lean methods to reduce eco-system fat'.  Let me talk about this ‘eco-system fat’. This is just a terminology that I use to represent the ‘undesired’ elements in the ecosystem of people, processes and technology fabric, similar to ‘undesired’ fat in our body. So even though organizations might have an ICC already in place and operating (in whatever capacity), over period of time processes tend to become difficult and ineffective, people seem to be getting stuck in a pattern of activities and hence become difficult to change etc etc. At the same time, context of what ICC does for the organization changes over period of time, need of the organization changes, environment changes. While all of that changes, things in ICC typically do not change in the same proportion and pace and hence what happens here that a layer of fat starts growing on various capabilities of the organization. By capabilities, I mean processes, knowledge, operations, contribution from staff, technology performance etc. Over a period of time, this fat makes the entire organizational system of the ICC  slower and less effective (in terms of delivering results) which basically means burning lot of dollars to improve anything in the eco-system.

With the current acute economical cost pressures, a shared system like ICC will need to reduce this fat significantly. One of the most successful ways to reduce this fat, (or better called non-performing elements of the ecosystem) is to adopt lean methods.

Continue reading ""What's next" for Integration Competency Centers? - Part 4" »

March 30, 2009

BPM and application eco-system based integration platforms

Finally organizations are coming to the terms of reality of multiple-integration platforms in their landscape. There was a time in not so distant past when clients were thinking to have a single middleware, struggling to migrate all the legacy of their enterprise on the so called ‘middleware of strategic choice’ (whatever it would have been for them at that point in time) and spending great deal of time and money in this process. Some managed to do, others got stuck in the time warp of technology evolution. And equally for those who managed to do it as well as who got stuck, time did the trick and soon the definition of the ‘middleware of strategic choice’ changed. It meant, those in the good feeling of ‘done with it’ have to again break their head to move the new legacy to the future platform. Those who were stuck it changed the to-be picture from one middleware to other and they were still stuck in their mess. Now what is happening is slightly more realistic and practical I guess. There are two key trends I can see:

Continue reading "BPM and application eco-system based integration platforms" »

"What's next" for integration competency centers? - Part 3

Next in the next-generation strategy kit is: “High degree of collaboration of the ICC across stakeholders that allows more transparency in the engagement and leads to co-creation of methods of delivery/operation of ICC with stakeholders”.

Basic premise for this view-point is the evolution of the working model for ICC. A typical model for shared services has ‘close door’ system or ‘black box’ system. It means that for rest of the organization, this shared services engagement is only for the delivery of service outcomes. For rest, ICC manages internally. It worked fine during early phase of the evolution of this system since it brought relief to other dependent parties from headache of managing variety of matters; now they could just focus on the outcomes from this shared service. But today, this black box is limiting the overall capability of the organization to innovate and improve

Continue reading ""What's next" for integration competency centers? - Part 3" »

February 27, 2009

"What's Next" for Integration Competency Centers - Part 2

In my last blog post of this series, I talked about the next-generation highlights of the ICC. First one in the list says: Next generation competency centers will make it lot easier to execute and manage the changes than how it is today. That will transform the role of 'change' from 'threat' to 'opportunity'.

Reason why I see it coming because I see today ‘ability to change’ to be a major roadblock in the enterprises irrespective of the area we talk about (technology, infrastructure, processes, standards etc.) and irrespective of the nature of the change (consolidate, standardize, migrate, optimize etc.). It means that unless we unlock the secret of managing the change better and make it easier to change, we are going to get poor results in almost all scenario. Let me take a real-life example out of my engagements to help understand this point.

Continue reading ""What's Next" for Integration Competency Centers - Part 2" »

February 03, 2009

"What's Next" for Integration Competency Centers? - Part 1

Factually, that’s the not the most popular question being asked by our clients so far. Potential reason could be that most of the enterprises are still catching up to establish an operational competency center capability. ‘What next’ has been the idea that I have been tossing every year in my mind since last 8 years as far as evolution of competency center is concerned. And I’m sure same had been cases for many more analyst and consultants across the globe. This global appetite to discover ‘what next’ and to materialize it in real life has helped the industry to progressively evolve a concept like Integration Competency Center. Result is that while 8 years back we were exploring the concepts of ICC together with our clients, 5 year back we were driving our clients into ICC and some of our clients were driving challenging ICC designs from us and in recent 2-3 years to our deep satisfaction clients have been demanding transformation to superior ICC designs and we are stretching our abilities/innovation to meet the demands. I believe that global economic dynamics that we are seeing today will soon start pushing the enterprises in medium to long term and in turn driving consultant like us toward ‘what next’ very seriously. So that’s about why I’m writing about it. I will be running a series of blogs on this topic to cover the end-to-end story over a period of time.

Continue reading ""What's Next" for Integration Competency Centers? - Part 1" »

January 20, 2009

Creating Sound and Credible Strategies for your Integration and SOA programs

I’m not really surprised to see the love-hate relationship between senior executives who own the integration portfolio and the ‘strategy consultants’ in my observation. Its love-hate dynamics because on one side where senior IT leadership strongly believes that a ‘strategic’ view is needed for creating the reliable roadmap for their initiatives, at the same time, there is really no reliable methods today to evaluate the appropriateness of the so called ‘strategy’ deliverables that consultants deliver. From the observation of the legacy in the enterprises I worked with, I find something very fundamental missing in those mysterious and high-end strategy documents: ‘Life’. Lack of life means that these strategies are more or less used as ‘initial requirements’ for certain programs/initiatives and as time progresses, strategies are not updated/maintained in line with changing state of the organization.

Continue reading "Creating Sound and Credible Strategies for your Integration and SOA programs" »