Discuss trends and ideas on the convergence of Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing (ITO) and Business Process Outsourcing (BPO). Find out how you can benefit from adopting a managed services delivery model, and learn more about how the bundling of consulting, technology and BPO services can transform your organization.

« April 2009 | Main | June 2009 »

May 26, 2009

Big Bang with the BOX

In my recent interaction with a global client CFO of a large publishing company, he made a very insightful observation, as to how keeping things simple in this increasingly complex world can be value-adding. When I pressed him further, he went on to say, “how I wish I can have a service on tap which brings along business process, people and technology together with accountability for business results”.

At that instance, I realized that the CFO was looking for a magic pill  ala process-in-a-box solution for his needs. Business Platforms brings to life not only  horizontal processes like Procure to Pay but also vertical specific industry processes  as well.

BPO players like us  have started out a new business-line of making boxes, for example: newspaper-in-a-box , bank-in-a-box (for more  details on vertical industry boxes -watch this space) to provide an out of the box solution bringing together the various pieces of vertical industry process, people domain expertise and technology together.

Business Platforms is the box to success for clients and BPO providers like us.

May 23, 2009

Business Platforms: A great opportunity for a complete makeover

Every day when I look at myself in the mirror, and as I add age and experience to myself, I do have an aspirational wish to have a complete makeover which can help me shed the small bags beneath my eyes, get rid of the double chin and fat around the waist-line……….While this remains an aspiration for me at the individual level, business platforms offers the unique opportunity for the clients to opt for a complete makeover.

As the client corporations have grown through consolidation, acquisition and demerger, they have accumulated various rigidities (baggage) in terms of processes and systems which while  been enabling so far, increasingly become constraints for speed, growth and agility in the new world. When the client corporation decide to outsource in the traditional way, they tend to look at themselves in the mirror and many a time tend to create a reflection of their current rigidities in the outsourced organization. This is due to the need to put in place – ‘processes within the constraints of their systems’ or ‘systems within the constraints of processes’. Due to the resource crunch, any attempt to change this first and then outsource involves significant resource effort , time and capital dollars.

Business Platforms is an unique way for the clients to have a complete makeover and build an harmonized business process with leading practices and standard best-in-class technology. They can make a paradigm shift, from function centric outsourcing to a process centric outsourcing approach with the ability to keep both technology and business process in-sync. All this with minimal upfront capital investment and ability to pay only for business outcomes, rather than having to incur significant investment ahead of business results.

So folks, the new Business Platform world beckons clients for a sustained makeover with minimal pain; no half measures here, you can move to a desired end-state and be Agile in the new world.

At an individual level, I continue to gaze at the mirror with the dreams of similar end-state for myself!

May 14, 2009

BPO mantra for success: Tech-savvy BPO

When the BPO industry came into existence more than a decade ago, the industry growth was enabled by Information Technology (IT) infrastructure. Today, the IT layer has moved past enablement to deliver differentiated services to customers that enhance business value facilitated by business process excellence + lean (six-sigma) based process improvements multiplied by the power of IT, thus helping business value multiplication for customers by an order of Magnitude.

In the new Information Technology Differentiated Services (ITDS) BPO world, you will see two layers of new services:

  1. Business Platform Solutions – an innovative service delivery model , which bundles consulting, technology application & Infrastructure and BPO to offer an outcome based pricing model thus helping the client to move from their current state to best-in-class state (transform while shift as opposed to - lift, shift and transform or Transform first and then Shift)
  2. Value-added technology wrapper tools – these tools work in conjunct with a client ERP or existing best-of-breed or legacy client system to plug the BPO specific gaps, increase the efficiency, productivity and enhance BPO process effectiveness

The cusp of technology, BPO and people domain experts coming together in a bundled way is the most important value lever available and building cusp capability is the only sustainable way to deliver and sustain high business value to customers. The new mantra for success in the BPO industry is about being a tech-savvy BPO. Survival of the fittest in the BPO industry would translate to survival of tech-savvy BPOs…

Platform Delivery- Changing Operating Models

The Operating model in platform based BPO is undergoing dramatic shifts from the traditional lift and shift BPO one and yet is a curious combination of the call center utilization driven one with the efficiency one in transaction processing outsourcing.

A traditional call center thrived on asset utilization for its operating model. The more efficient contact center service providers believed they were so, because they would use “seat”, physical and technology infrastructure as much as possible to have maximum resources per seat. The shift factor model has traditionally favored the service provider while conceding a small portion of that benefit into pricing related discounts on a per FTE basis. Shift factor, thus became the mantra for a good operating model for pure play contact center service providers.

 

As transaction processing outsourcing gained greater momentum across multi-geography based service providers, these service providers retained some fundamental principles of the shift factor concept. They however, had greater focus on end to end business functions, Procure to Pay, Record to Report, Quote to Cash, to create greater efficiencies for customers in these business functions. Metrics started moving from transactional metrics like TAT, quality to operations focused metrics such as AR ageing, Order Value on hold etc. There were other indirect business benefits impacting the customer in terms of reduced revenue leakageetc.  These were achieved through IT enhancement, Quality framework deployment or process harmonization as cases in point. Enhanced Efficiency became the end game for a good operating model for transaction process outsourcing service providers.

 

Enter Platform based BPO. A platform Service Provider develops and maintains the underlying application, hosts it and runs business processes/functions on the platform. Because the service provider has a singular view of the underlying application and the business process that runs on its, the ability to affect a customer’s business function is far more enhanced compared to a traditional BPO model. In this model, the service provider, by way of having a complete view of the application and business process is able to bring in significant focus on business metrics such as cost of pay per $ million or cost as percentage of total spend.

 

Let us now move back to the operating models. Here is where the curious combination of the call center and transaction process outsourcing models emerges. I had earlier written about the call centers and the maximum resources per seat. The same concept applies but in a different manner. The platform operating model is built on a multi-tenant basis where multiple clients are serviced in a shared center. The focus due to this multi tenancy is minimum resources per client.

 

Again, because of single point of ownership of the underlying application and the business processes that runs on it, the ability of the service provider to automate and reduce the number of resources servicing the account is enhanced. Also, in a multi-tenancy model, the service provider’s flexibility to cross-pollinate resources across engagements (with maximum adherence to security and risk guidelines) allows for further utilization. Like in the transaction processing model, the ability of the service provider to bring in traditional services like spend analysis, KPO etc. that further drives the efficiency driven model. A combination of the utilization and efficiency models along with the ability to affect the business will make transformational effectiveness the mantra for the integrated IT BPO based operating model.

May 07, 2009

Business Platform Benefits: Part 2

I was posed with a question in one of the discussions, which I am raising again in this post. What should be the primary metric of evaluation for business benefit realization, for an enterprise which is on-boarding on the platform?

While I organize my thoughts let me put some numbers around the definition of the enterprise for more clarity in my thoughts as well the question, let a small size enterprise be less than USD 1bn in revenue, mid size ranging from USD1 to 10bn in revenue and large size be more than USD 10bn in revenue.

When I tried to answer the question raised above considering the classification of enterprise defined, I had an equal number of team members favoring centralization of processes and reduced on-boarding time respectively as primary metrics for consideration in case of small size enterprise. However, our views were just not getting contained in the conference room when we discussed this for a mid size or a large enterprise customer. What is the defining metric which would be the primary yardstick for business benefit realization?

Options being discussed included savings generated, revenue maximization, process maturity, adaptability to customer’s IT landscape, from dedicated layers in platform to dedicated platform itself. We were just not able to align and say “yes” there it is, “the metric” which an organization should use for measurement.

Let me try and propose an approach here for arriving at the metric; let me call that approach as – SCP, where S stands for segment in which customer operates, C for customer herself and P for platform. Let me now try and explain how I want to define this approach. Whenever a customer would attempt to arrive at a metric or a set of metrics for evaluation of business platform fitment in its business growth plan let the customer define the segment (S) of its business operation and map herself in the segment against leading and future trends in the segment and also against leaders and challengers in the segment. Next step would be of mapping future state (of C) where the customer wants to be in next 12 months and in next 5 years. This mapping activity would complete SC part of the SCP approach. As a concluding step the customer will have to map the business platform (P) and identify whether the business platform with its features and the benefits it brings, enables the customer to meet defined business objectives arrived in SC part of analysis, both in short and long term. While doing this analysis the metric or the set of metrics which the customer uses would be the primary yardstick with which the evaluation of business platform needs to be undertaken.

A question which is now coming to my mind is that wouldn’t this approach be equally applicable for small size enterprise as well.

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Categories

Infosys on Twitter