Multiply your supplier collaboration effort using Platform
Continue reading "Multiply your supplier collaboration effort using Platform" »
Continue reading "Multiply your supplier collaboration effort using Platform" »
Continue reading "Unified technology is vital for managing Supply Risk effectively" »
While there are many different ways these cloud services can be delivered, the two main conduits are ‘Public cloud’ and ‘Private cloud’. Public cloud typically is the service which is available to everyone with a standard offering and you pay a fee based on computing power usage while Private cloud on the other hand is available to specific organization only on a platform model. For eg. not anyone can plug into to spend analytics service provider say at Infosys cloud and can buy the spend report based cloud services from Infosys. However the real test of cloud services provider would be their ability to evolve this platform model on a multi-tenant architecture. Shared infrastructure thus would not only bring economy of scale but would also be a good breeding ground in driving innovation due to its ability to get a real time access of customer behavior, business need and cross pollination of best practices within the private cloud and let organization drive non-core business processes managed through the cloud services using platform model.
While evaluating eSourcing tool organization needs to consider two very important factors as well – one: Ease of use, two: Customer and training support. It is vital to keep following in mind while choosing eSourcing tool:
1. Focus on business aspect than technology superiority: It is important to consider ‘ease of use’ and this need to be from the perspective of internal users as well as external users to accommodate change management on the supplier side also.
2. Look for business value of feature than just availability: It’s a known fact that organizations typically use only a fraction of functionality available in any package. So the evaluation of solution should be based on business value the feature would actually be providing rather than just availability and complexity.
3. Effective Customer Support: It is absolutely essential to have support from your eSourcing tool vendor in terms of high responsiveness and resolution of customer queries. This is a key to successfully conduct sourcing event and achieve the end objective.
Fortunately now organizations also has option of managed services for Sourcing which focuses on realized savings as an outcome rather than underlying eSourcing technology and is fast emerging as a generally accepted service model. It is typically on a gain share pricing model – a trend maturing fast in this space.
Green purchasing has shown excellent resilience during current tough economic time and delivered value through sustainable cost savings thereby breaking the myth that – It’s a social obligation and so you have to necessarily pay an extra premium. There are three most important aspects to be considered while detailing out policy for green purchasing – social obligation, environmental impact & economic benefit. Of these the latter – which is directly related to the cost equation needs to be broadened for life cycle costing approach , so the cost equation not only need to capture cost for energy, waste and duration but also additionally include cost for repair & maintenance, disposable effort, health & safety compliance thereby offsetting any potential financial and environmental risks to the organization in today’s increased regulatory world.
We have noticed that most of the organizations assessment of carbon footprint is mostly limited to ‘organic buying’, ‘local buying’, ‘eco friendly or 'energy star certification’ and reason for this is that there’s no universal criterion which can be applied to every situation. Buyers need to define green policy for each spend category keeping following broad criteria in mind:
- Look for energy efficiency
- Avoid hazardous, toxic foot print in the product or services
- Conservation for heat, light, water and other natural resources
- Look for refurbishment and recyclability
- Easy disposability like bio-gradable
- Leverage technology automation
This brings us back to the most debated aspect – How compliant your purchasing processes are?
Unless organization leverage technology to embed green policy into its purchasing processes- like green specification & standards, green selection criteria, life cycle costing approach, green clauses in contracts at an enterprise level, it is difficult to comply with green purchasing commitment. It is extremely important for organization to leverage the green technology – eSourcing, eProcurement and eAccount Payable (which avoid paper heavy manual processes – saving tones of paper) thereby making its purchasing processes not only more effective & efficient but would also ensure complying with green purchasing policies at an enterprise level.
It is now by and large evident that the next generation BPO will happen on more complicated and knowledge based process outsourcing in a much shorter time span, and organization’s objective would be to attain transformational benefit rather than cost savings alone. The ongoing recession has brought some method in the madness towards outsourcing rush wherein service providers are being challenged to articulate value proposition beyond ‘cost savings’ alone as a long term strategy. Today we are seeing plethora of solutions mushrooming in the provider’s offering list even if they are not solution in real sense. The next generation BPO solution has to primarily address:
-‘Standardization’ to drive savings through shared service model from a low cost location and this invariably can’t be achieved unless the underlying technology layer is seamless
-‘Tailoring’ to address client specific nuances in terms of process, language and skills in an integrated fashion to enable client become more agile to external environment.
Standardization and Tailoring, though sounds conflicting necessarily needs to be in optimal balance and its right mix is key to the success of next generation BPO solution. This would also mean that service providers would need to have a good handle on both process and technology while executing outsourcing for much needed aspired transformational benefits.
In the recent past we had multiple interactions with prospects and existing customers on the pricing model for Platform based solutions for "Source to Pay" (managed services).Various stakeholders have expressed opinions which rightly address their concerns but it’s hard to conclude to a single model.
Let me start out with a fundamental argument. What is the objective of an outsourcing engagement? Is it to impact business process from a business requirement standpoint or to impact at transactional level?
In my view a transactional view does not enable a service provider to create any transformational value for clients. Service providers will perform the transactional work as per agreed SLA but will not be in a position to appreciate or contribute larger business goals that client organizations strive for. The transactional view probably provides benefits which are tangible, but are far from business benefits that is the need of the hour.
A pricing model should also reflect the basic premise (transformational v/s transactional) and should use the right metrics accordingly. In the next post I would like to discuss with the audience various pricing models that can be proposed. Till then please feel free to share your views on pricing.
Continue reading "How Source-to-Pay platform can help you achieve transformational savings?" »
Continue reading "Variablize your contract prices. Simplify your sourcing strategy." »
Continue reading "Leverage your suppliers to drive innovation" »
Procurement outsourcing has registered excellent traction and faster adoptions over last year with high growth thereby helped purchasing organizations achieve quick savings in a tough economic environment. While purchasing organizations continue to be gung-ho about reducing their operation cost riding on labor cost arbitrage, most of the organizations are likely to miss the bigger saving opportunity, ‘procurement outsourcing’ can offer through effective spend management. Once the ongoing economic turbulence will subside, organization will soon realize that in a moment of frenzy they have been able to muster only a small pie of bigger savings opportunity and are locked in a rigid structure which will offer them very less room for effective spend management. Unless organizations invest beforehand in underlying technology and process it‘s not possible for them to reap full benefit of procurement outsourcing.
Continue reading "Procurement outsourcing: Don't let leakage become flood" »
Organizations are increasingly viewing procurement as a strategic function due to its unique ability to influence spend, which contributes directly to its bottom line. Taking a myopic view on efficiency alone can hurt organizations where in only operating costs are cut to the bone without focusing on strategic sourcing savings, which is a big ticket item. The most common dilemma faced by CPO’s are – whether to capture cost arbitrage based savings quickly or aim towards much higher strategic sourcing savings by adopting a path of transformation. Taking a balanced view on both is necessary for sustainable cost savings.
Continue reading "Don’t focus on ‘Efficiency’ alone while Outsourcing Procurement" »
Procurement Outsourcing (PO) burst into outsourcing scene with lots of promise & hype in the early part of this decade, however it has failed to live its fullest potential and still lags behind other outsourcing areas like FA and HRO due to various reasons. Organizations are now realizing that the potential of procurement outsourcing (PO) is not just limited to traditional cost arbitrage but effective management of overall spend, which contributes directly to the bottom line savings, especially for the ‘non core’ part. While PO deals has demonstrated numerous tactical benefits such as reduction in operation cost and sourcing savings in an isolated way, most of the organizations are still struggling to realize the full potential of PO in an integrated way. Even the much hyped ‘sole sourcing outsourcing’ deals based on gain-share model failed to deliver the targeted benefit, as most of the time actual ‘realized savings‘ was actually a fraction of ‘identified savings’ and thus form a major conflict between Finance & Purchase department in terms of procurement department performance. Organizations typically based their projected sourcing savings on the assumption that end-user community would follow the ‘contract pricing’, but in reality they have achieved low compliance & adoption in the absence of unified procurement platform and structure.
Continue reading "Reap full benefits of Procurement Outsourcing with a Unified Approach" »