If CRM has been a struggle or a passion for you then Infosys’ CRM blogs is the place to be in. Come join us as we discuss the latest trends, innovations and happenings which will have a bearing on CRM.

« May 2009 | Main | July 2009 »

June 30, 2009

‘Anyone’ Relationship Management

My previous post (Investing in Customers, during Recession) discussed how successful companies tend to invest in customers during an economic downturn. While this is a proven strategy, the execution of it is often plagued with practical limitations of the ever-shrinking discretionary budget spends and similar such roadblocks that are characteristics of a cautionary, recession-hit landscape.


However, several tactics employed by companies, driven by the demands of a recessionary economy are emerging as genuine CRM trends, with reasonable longevity to survive being called a fad.

The common theme of most of these ‘recession-nourished’ trends is the need to stretch the CRM dollar, thereby increasing the ROI on CRM initiatives. Often, due to upper management directive and at times due to an instinctive response to turbulent times, companies have been actively trying to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of CRM initiatives. Fine tuning existing CRM processes and using already available CRM infrastructure to derive more business benefits, is commonly observed during a recessionary economy. A company focusing on ‘sales lead conversion effectiveness’ as opposed to ‘sales lead generation adeptness’ is a common example of the change of tactics in the CRM space, being influenced by an economic downturn.
 

Anyone relationship Management ( to borrow from the Microsoft’s CRM platform solution, xRM ) is considered the natural evolution of CRM (Customer Relationship Management) and PRM (Partner Relationship Management). It stems from the realization that managing relationships with Partners, Field Sales Representatives and Employees needn’t be greatly different from each other. The basic tenets of Relationship management remain the same! ( I suppose, it isn’t true for human relationships, though  Smile)


The reason ‘Anyone relationship Management’ is discussed as a prominent ‘recession-nourished’ trend is the fact that the streamlining and resource savings, such solutions promise is no longer considered a bonus, but rather is treated as an essential condition for any CRM initiative to earn a budget approval.
Infosys has been proactively assisting clients in identifying and implementing such initiatives. An example from one of our clients is recounted here.


One of our clients, wanted to create an internet portal with confidential, Sales related information for their Sales representatives around the world, the cost of the project was prohibitive for the sales department though.
Now, the client had implemented an Oracle iStore e-commerce solution (Oracle iStore incidentally is listed in the ‘Leader’ quadrant by Gartner) to enable purchase of accessories by their customers and compliments their conventional Sales channels. The Infosys team suggested that the same CRM solution aimed at the web customers, could be leveraged and extended to the ‘internal customers’ too. A specialty iStore site was setup, to engage the Sales Representatives similar to the end-customers. Certain end-customer specific functionalities like discussion forums, shopping carts and ability to create Quotes fitted the Sales Representatives ‘like a glove’, as per our client’s assertion.


The twin benefits of ‘stretching the CRM dollar’ and establishing a cohesive relationship management model, was well received and it even spawned two additional initiatives for specialty iStore sites at engaging two additional sets of stake-holders. As our client realized, using an existing CRM solution to manage relationships with other stakeholders, like partners, vendors and employees remarkably improves the efficiency of CRM solutions and increases the return on CRM investments.


An increased ROI! …well, if that doesn’t catch the attention of your project sponsor, then nothing else will!

June 29, 2009

Customer Relationship Management, with a human touch...and not just technology

When it comes to CRM, it is mostly positioned or hyped as a technology solution and Customers invest significantly to implement the state-of-the-art and best-of-the-breed CRM Technology Solutions (such as CRM Package, Contact Center System, Business Intelligence, Master Data Management, to name a few), however, if all these investments are made assuming that just technology alone (without the human touch), will improve customer satisfaction, we would be wrong.

We would appreciate the fact, that most of our next door small shops/stores have established true long term Customer Relationship, through their personal attention and care, in meeting our day today needs and requirements. We would have traditionally been buying goods, from them, for years, in the past and are sure to continue in the future as well, as long as we both continue to exist. Some of these shops/stores hardly know about the sophisticated CRM technologies, but what they all know is ‘True Customer Relationship and Care’, where they put themselves in our shoes while servicing our needs, retaining the true philosophy of ‘Customer is the King’.

But today, we see huge investments being made by Organizations in CRM technology, but this needs to be done keeping the end users (Customers, Employees and Partners) in mind, appreciating the fact that they are human beings (with feelings) and not just robots.

We can see a few examples to explain this situation,

1. In spite of having the state of the art CRM and Contact Center Technologies, if Customers are unable to have a unified view of their information across all access channels (phone/IVRS, e-mail, web, mobile etc) or if they do not get a polite response/correct information from the Customer Service Representatives (CSRs), they would be disgusted.

2. If the CRM application is not user friendly, for the Employees (Sales, Marketing and Service teams) and Partners, due to numerous parameters/fields for inputs/outputs and complex flows between different screens, it would practically become very difficult for them to use it on a daily basis. They would still continue to use it for name sake, than enjoying the user experience and seeing value in it.

3. In spite of having a futuristic Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS), if there are too many menus/options or if the speech recognition is not user friendly or if the Web based on-line application is very complex, with too many options/parameters, the Customers (especially those who are not tech savvy) would really get lost and be dissatisfied with the overall service experience.

4. If the Customer Requests are not serviced on time (be it sales orders or service support requests), due to the fact that the diverse back end applications/systems are not tightly integrated (say CRM, Order Management, Billing, Provisioning, Fulfillment, to name a few), the Customer would still be quite upset.

5. When campaigns (say phone call campaigns, e-mail campaigns) becomes a nuisance for the Customers, we might actually be losing them, than gaining them.

These are just a few examples, where there is too much emphasis/focus only on the technology part of CRM, leaving the basic fact that the Customers, Employees and Partners are human beings, who would prefer user friendly applications and Customers would value personal care during their direct interactions with the Sales/Service Teams, beyond complete automation.

If time permits, we would still enjoy the experience of going to the nearby store to buy a Music System of our choice (well supported by the personal care, attention and service of the store representative), than just ordering it online (even though it is more convenient).

While technology is certainly an important enabler for Customer Relationship Management (CRM), without the human touch, true customer satisfaction can hardly be achieved. So the CRM application should really have a simple and user-friendly interface (to make life easier for all the stake holders – Customers, Employees and Partners), combined with well groomed sales/service service representatives (who would really care for their Customers). This combination of Technology along with the human touch will go a long way to enhance true customer relationship and satisfaction, thereby leading to increased business and revenues.

Customer Satisfaction Survey could be a good source of information to measure and monitor the pulse of the Customer. If we could promptly act upon the Customer feedback and suggestions, especially in making every Customer interaction an enjoyable experience for them (by combining CRM technology and human touch), we can ensure that our Customers would vouch for us. The Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) such as Customer Service Response Time, Abandoned Call Rate, First Call Resolution, Customer Satisfaction Ratings, Percentage of Repeat Business, Percentage of New Business through referrals, to name a few, would help us to enhance Customer Satisfaction, in the long run. There are Organizations offering excellent Customer Service at an affordable cost, while others offering it at a premium. Possibly, even in this case, the right blend of CRM technology and human touch could help Organizations to differentiate themselves in the market place.

I am sure all of you would have some thoughts to share on these lines and I would appreciate your view and experiences as well…

June 25, 2009

How ICRM can aid in decision support for enhancing customer relationships

by Vamsi Krishna Paramjyothi

The market today is mature and highly competitive with several players, providing similar services at competitive prices with new products being released into the market in short intervals.  Competition and the demanding customer, who is willing to shift to another product or service provider, unless his /her wants aren’t met readily, are giving companies a tough time.

With multiple players offering similar products/services, most customers are tied to one or the other player. In addition to that, competitors are vying for your customer, as a result customer retention has become critical for survival. Which means one should be totally aware of customer preferences; the value customers see in your product/services, customer preferred communication channels, etc. Understanding the customer pulse, launching innovative products and retaining customers is mandatory for survival in this industry. In such a scenario companies are relying on CRM to achieve the above mentioned objectives, then why are we seeing so many product failures or why are we seeing minimal response for email campaigns, etc. The industry benchmark for click rate of email campaigns’ is around 10% to 40%, based on the relevance of email content with client’s expectation.
 
Which raises questions like, can CRM really help to achieve the above mentioned objectives?  If yes then how? What is going wrong?
 
Analyzing the CRM projects implemented will show that CRM implementation was done to achieve operational CRM efficiencies. If CRM has to support in decision support and help in enhancing customer relationship by giving appropriate insights about customer then one has to implement “Intelligence CRM“ i.e. ICRM. ICRM is a framework to derive intelligence and insights to address specific business challenges by applying configurable decision support models on customer related data from multiple data sources spanning across the enterprise and beyond. This information required for decision support can be obtained only if operational data is translated into valuable information. Hence implementation objectives should move towards ICRM from Operational CRM (OCRM). With so much customer data readily available with companies, it is not difficult to derive these preferences by using proper modeling tools and Intelligence tools.

Reading all this you may wonder if ICRM is Analytical CRM which has been repackaged Smile However it differs from ACRM and I will touch upon these differences in my next post.

About the Author

Vamsi is a Consultant with Enterprise Solutions and has extensive experience in process consulting, package evaluation and implementation for Telecom and FMCG clients. He is managing a CRM project for a leading telecom company and has more than 5 years of experience in sales and marketing, churn management and customer experience management. Vamsi will blog on ICRM, PRM, marketing and churn management.

June 24, 2009

Federated MDM Data Domains - A Perspective

By Madhukar N.S.M.

You might feel that the word “federated” is generally associated to data models and database designs. Federated MDM Data Domains means a union of “disparate" data without which the enterprise MDM hub is incomplete. I will take the example of a Customer MDM enterprise hub and elaborate further.

In a customer hub, the typical data stored is the customer demographic, address data etc. An enterprise will have the various products sold, services, marketing campaigns, offers and interactions and to keep track of this data is highly critical. The nature of data for instance offers and interactions data is so unique that it might not required to store directly in the core customer hub. There are two options when building a Customer Hub, either store the entire data on a central hub or federate the data. Based on the enterprise size, complexity and the need the Central versus Federated approaches are finalized in an MDM implementation. Federated data domain is implemented in case of huge data volumes, high accessibility, highly performing and higher scalability and low maintenance windows available in production. 

Let me throw some more light on the Federated data domain. Take the earlier example of customer, services, offers, campaigns and interaction. Imagine Customer is in the center of the universe, with the planets being the services, offers, campaigns and interaction data (except that this disparate data is tied with the customer ids. Technically, Federated data domains follow a hub and spoke architecture where at the hub the core entity information is stored and in the spokes the federated data is stored. Federation can be extended to data and business services where data can be sourced from multiple sources. The services federation will orchestrate the required business data from the federated data domain to be catered to various LOBs and channels in the organization. Major advantages of the federated data domains are high scalability, reliability, high system availability.

If you would like to read more about this concept, please visit my point of view Paper at http://www.infosys.com/crm/idea-center/federated-data-domains.pdf. This paper also discusses the implementation challenges and a case study.

About the Author

Madhukar is a Senior Consultant working on end to end solutions in Customer Relationship Management (CRM) and Master Data Management (MDM) areas. He has led various green field implementations of CRM solutions for clients in Banking, Retail and Education verticals. With a strong CRM and ERP background, Madhukar now works on Customer Data Integration / Master Data Management Solutions for Banking and Financial Services Institutions.

 

June 23, 2009

Fringe benefits of CRM

I like to think of myself as a CRM evangelist, spreading the word of CRM, one project at a time. I was recently involved in a CRM deployment project that was a little different from the usual. The client organization had bought an expensive CRM application in order to keep time. That’s right- a kind of audit trail on the work being done by the Business users!

But this project that I was working on was ground-breaking, in a sense, because for the first time in three years we were using native features such as Account, Contact and Email management. It took some convincing but all the credit for the change goes to the Business Manager on the other side of the table who saw the value in CRM and took it forward. She had come to view CRM as an essential tool to improve efficiency and transparency and relentlessly campaigned for the application with her bosses, her peers and her subordinates. 

During the course of the project, she had a funny experience which she shared with me. It seems that on the previous weekend, she had called her cable television company about some extra charges on her bill. At one point, she struck up a CRM related dialogue with the call center agent
She:     “Are you by any chance using Siebel in your call center?”
Agent: “Yeah, that’s right”
She:     “Oh good! Right now, do you see my Account details like my address etc, on your screen and the plan that I am on currently?”
Agent: “Yes, that’s exactly what I am seeing right now”
She:     “And are you typing some notes about our call onto the Account?”
The agent was completely taken aback at her questions. He seemed confused and was wondering if it was one of those mystery shoppers. Nervously, he said-“Yes I am putting in Notes about our conversation.”
Seizing the opportunity, she quickly slam dunked her next question-  “So how is it, you cant see the Notes of my previous conversation with another agent? I had discussed the same problem with him and yet it wasn’t resolved”
The agent was completely floored with the unexpected question. Whatever plans that the agent might have had of defending the charges had now disappeared. Fumbling for an answer he said “I am sorry you were charged extra this month. It’ll be waived in the next month’s bill. Also, as a valued customer, we’ll waive your charges for the next month. Is there anything else I can help you with?”

So when she came back the next Monday and narrated her experiences, we both had a good laugh. After all, the payback period on CRM projects was supposed to be much longer!

June 19, 2009

Notes from HP Software Universe 2009, Las Vegas: Day 4

By Shashank Shekhar Shukla
 
Day 4 was a half day with the SW Universe closing at 1 pm. The solution showcase opened at 9 am and the solution demos were presented till 12 pm. Post that the 1 hour time was utilized in interacting with other attendees and learning about upcoming products. The Infosys team had another successful session on Test Automation. This session generated a lot of interest.

Soon it was time to pack up the booth and store away the good memories of 5 days of intense hard work with good results to show for the same. This year’s sessions and the quality of attendees was excellent, this was a great learning experience for me. Also Infosys got excellent visibility from our Solution win as well as the 2 sessions with our clients. The HP SW Universe website has the BPT solution collaterals uploaded on their literature server which will be accessible to thousands of users in the coming days. Please also visit our site for more around our package assurance services.

Hoping to see you at the event next year. Wishing you a bug free year ahead Smile

About the Author

Shashank is a Consultant with Enterprise Solutions and has been with Infosys for 4 years, aditionally he has 2 years experience in the FSI domain. He is an SME around QA with hands on experience in Manual testing, Test automation & Performance Testing. Shashank has been involved in the designing and delivery of 5 solutions including Siebel BPT.

 

Notes from HP Software Universe 2009, Las Vegas: Day 3, Sessions, product launches are the theme of the day

By Shashank Shekhar Shukla

Day 3 was a day of intense activity with the solution showcase open from 9 am till 6 pm. This was interspersed with Enablement sessions around new product launches from HP and track sessions from various HP clients. I got the opportunity to get trained on some of the latest HP products like HP QC 10.0, PC 9.5 & Business Availability Center 9.0. I also attended a few sessions around Performance Testing. The Infosys team had a track session in partnership with UBS which was very well received.

On the solution front we had lots of walk ins during the day, a lot of these visitors were looking for a demo of our award winning solution - Siebel BPT. The long day was rounded off by a partner appreciation dinner with HP.

June 18, 2009

Notes from HP Software Universe 2009, Las Vegas: Day 2, Buzz around testing automation

By Shashank Shekhar Shukla

Day 2 at the event comprised of the HP SW Universe Mainstage and the Solution showcase opening. Infosys team participated in the Mainstage event and shared their inputs on partnership with HP. Post the mainstage the Infosys team held meetings with key HP executives.
 

We demonstrated our solution suite in the solution showcase. The solutions being highlighted were the Siebel BPT Solution, ACCORD & ClearWare solution. The BPT solution was also made available at the HP SW Universe literature download as it was a winning solution and there were a lot of requests around further information and for demos. In the evening there was also a reception dinner with the HP alliance team along with other partners.

In the solution showcase open from 6pm to 9 pm there were many visitors to our booth who were keen to get a higher ROI from their testing investments.

Session details are given below -

Presentation
Title: Service-Level Metrics: A key to successful Test Automation
Date: June 17
Time: 16:00 PST
Track Session No. : 1498
Presenters: Allyson Fischer, QA Head, Director, Wealth Management UBS, North America and Ashok Kattimani, Infosys Technologies

Abstract
Despite expensive tools and skilled team members, test automation projects face challenges such as high number of failed scripts, schedule slippages, incomplete test coverage and risk of automation tools turning shelf ware. This presentation covers the methodology of managing test automation projects by defining, baselining and implementing service-level metrics clearly.

Presentation 
Title: Baker Hughes SAP Program: Building and Leveraging a Testing Centre of Excellence
Date: June 18
Time: 9:00 PST
Track Session No. : 1499
Presenters: JoAnn Kern, MySAP Program Director - Baker Hughes and Jayasundar Rajagopalan, Senior Test Manager, Infosys Technologies

Abstract
Baker Hughes leveraged HP tools to automate testing and built a Testing Center of Excellence to minimize user acceptance testing, improve quality of delivery and reduce post-go live issues to near zero. Find out how this transformational project enabled Baker Hughes to move to a repeatable and automated testing strategy. This supports release management for SAP and other enterprise applications, and ensures the highest quality of delivery.

Hoping to see many of you there as we discuss the Testing Center of Excellence.

 

Notes from HP Software Universe 2009, Las Vegas: Day 1 – Best solution award for Infosys’ Siebel BPT solution

By Shashank Shekhar Shukla

I am currently at Las Vegas, attending the HP SW Universe, 2009. I am seeing a lot of buzz in this event and its quite amazing to see the passion of the attendees. Testing automation is definitely the in-thing and I have been meeting a lot of people who are passionate about this subject. I wanted to share with you all the happenings at this event and will be posting a daily note, so here goes my note for day 1 (June 16th)

Day 1
 
Day 1 at the HP SW Universe was dedicated to the Partner summit wherein HP Partner Mainstage was conducted. The mainstage included sessions from senior HP Management on the upcoming Product updates, Sales events and Partner engagement programs. The Keynote session was delivered on "Business Model Transition". Also as part of the mainstage Infosys won the "Best Solution of the Year" award across all the HP Global partners for its Siebel BPT solution.
 
The key highlights of the award are:
• Infosys Solution won the award against stiff competition from other global SI's like IBM, Accenture, Microsoft, SAP and Indian SI's like TCS, Wipro, Cognizant etc.
• The Solution won among a shortlist of 20 solutions which in itself was a byproduct of hundreds of nominations
• Infosys was the only Indian SI to win an award at the HP SW Universe
• The award was distributed in the Keynote session with close to 1000 attendees representing close to 500 customer and partner organizations
• The award details will be posted on the HP SW Universe website, will share the link once this happens. 

It is indeed a great feeling to see our solution getting the award. So all in all it was a great day for me personally. 

 

June 16, 2009

An abused tool called IVR

I often wonder if CRM will soon be a hygiene factor and not a differentiating factor.  And the answer usually is in the negative. Take IVR for instance. IVR or Interactive Voice Response is the recorded message that guides you down a path as you punch the option keys on your telephone. Companies primarily use IVR to divert your call to right agent who can help you with the problem in a most efficient manner. IVR best practice recommends that there be no more than three layers between the Customer and the agent but this has been long lost on the companies. In their obsession to land the calls at the right agent’s desk to improve efficiency, banks and other institutions have abused the IVR system. The IVR tree has now grown so many branches that if you find yourself on the wrong branch, it’s easier to hang up and dial again instead of shouting for help.  I love my bank’s website because it allows me to check my statements, pay bills, transfer funds etc very easily. But sometimes when I have a super special requirement or a question, I am forced to contact the call center. Going though the bank’s IVR is like a game of Monopoly. Here’s why-
1)       Getting to the right agent is like getting to the right square on the board.  Little to the left or to the right can be dangerous.
2)       Punching the right combination of ATM Debit Card Number, Pin Number, Birth Date and other stuff is like rolling the right numbers.
3)       If you fat finger the wrong code, you could simply end up in jail and wait for ever to get out of it. And even if you get all the combinations right, you may have to wait for several minutes to get you turn.
4)       And finally, you need to devote sufficient time, maybe an entire Saturday’s afternoon, to know the result. IVR like Monopoly is not for the Jerry in a hurry!
I have an account at another branch and their IVR is worse. No matter what pin numbers and debit card numbers I dial, I usually find myself going down a one way street to jail. It’s like playing Monopoly blindfolded!
My immediate action plan for the banks would be-
a) flatten the IVR to not more than 3 branches and 3 options per branch with one of them being the option to talk to the agent b) inform the customers upfront of the expected wait times for both self service and service via live agent c) constantly look for ways to flatten the IVR, like training agents to handle any kind of service calls.
Banks and other institutions have implemented the right tools the wrong way. As a result of which, their applications help them keep track of data, increase visibility and improve efficiency at Customer Management. But in the process they have missed out on the Relationship part. So many companies are yet to get the combination of Customer, Relationship and Management right and so at least for now- the conclusion is that CRM is still a differentiation factor.

Where Is SaaS Heading?

"Software as a Service is a model of software deployment whereby a provider licenses an application to customers for use as a service on demand. SaaS software vendors may host the application on their own web servers or download the application to the consumer device, disabling it after use or after the on-demand contract expires. The on-demand function may be handled internally to share licenses within a firm or by a third-party application service provider (ASP) sharing licenses between firms."[1]

SaaS originally got off the ground with customer relationship management and human resources applications. But recent trends have shown SaaS spread its reach into areas like online backup, Web conferencing, collaboration, and IT systems management. But the reach of SaaS into Enterprise Solution integration and Business Intelligence has been limited so far.

SaaS is no longer solely for the start-up software firm in the current IT scenario as was considered when it was introduced initially. Enterprise software developers, big and small, have started offering SaaS based mainstream applications to keep up with the market demands.  With customers seeking rigorous specifications and setting high expectation standards, application development process has evolved into a whole new segment with a lot of constraints, making the competition fierce in the current scenario with big players beginning to adopt the SaaS delivery model to internal applications by redesigning applications around SOA back ends and RIA interfaces.

So where does SaaS head now? In the current market scenario, one can see a lot of paths being taken. But two paths that have attracted recent attention are the ones where in SaaS is going towards an integrated path leading into the realm of Cloud Computing and where SaaS is shifting into a PaaS model?

"Platform as a service (PaaS) is the delivery of a computing platform and solution stack as a service. It facilitates deployment of applications without the cost and complexity of buying and managing the underlying hardware and software layers, providing all of the facilities required to support the complete life cycle of building and delivering web applications and services entirely available from the Internet"[2]—with no software downloads or installation for developers, IT managers or end-users. It's also known as cloudware. PaaS, or "Platform as a Service" could be the new acronym that defines a web-oriented model where in more than just specific vertical "services" are delivered as SaaS (e.g CRM, ERP, etc).

PaaS offerings include workflow facilities for application design, application development, testing, deployment and hosting as well as application services such as team collaboration, web service integration and marshalling, database integration, security, scalability, storage, persistence, state management, application versioning, application instrumentation and developer community facilitation. These services are provisioned as an integrated solution over the web.

PaaS speaks to a more generalized services platform concept. If we consider the "web as a platform" as a notion of multiple services in the cloud, then PaaS treats these services as several mashup design patterns where the customer is given the option to choose from. These patterns are part of a continuum ranging from pure browser presentation mashups to client-side mashups onto the server-side services and data mashups. Architecturally speaking, when someone considers the composite applications pattern for delivering the SaaS apps, it is where PaaS steps in.

"Cloud computing is a style of computing in which dynamically scalable and often virtualized resources are provided as a service over the Internet."[3] Users need not have knowledge of, expertise in, or control over the technology infrastructure in the "cloud" that supports them.

"The concept incorporates infrastructure as a service (IaaS), platform as a service (PaaS) and software as a service (SaaS) as well as other technology buzzwords that have the common theme of reliance on the Internet for satisfying the computing needs of the users. Cloud computing services usually provide common business applications online that are accessed from a web browser, while the software and data are stored on the servers." [3]

"The term cloud is used as a metaphor for the Internet, based on how the Internet is depicted in computer network diagrams, and is an abstraction for the complex infrastructure it conceals." [3]

While Cloud computing is still at an early stage, with a varied mixture of large and small providers delivering a mix of cloud-based services, from full-blown applications to storage services to spam filtering. For the most part, in today’s existing scenario IT must plug into cloud-based services individually, until cloud computing aggregators and integrators emerge completely. With cloud-based interconnection seldom in evidence, cloud computing can be merely described as "sky computing".[4]

So are we going to see a shift of SaaS towards integrating into Cloud Computing or evolve into a more-efficient PaaS, only time can tell? But with the demands of industry growing by the day, the future of SaaS seems to be secure either through Cloud Computing or through PaaS.

June 12, 2009

Business Process Testing – Next Generation Solution for Siebel Automation Testing

My previous post on business process testing touched upon some of the challenges being faced by companies in testing automation. In this post I will touch upon some more testing automation challenges and go into details around our solution for overcoming these challenges.

Did you know that traditional test automation used a Record-and-play approach to develop test automation scripts? What it meant was that every time that the code would change, it would mandate significant scripting to ensure test automation wouldn’t fail! Also, for a small change in the user interface, this would typically require test engineers to modify multiple test scripts.

How do we address this?

Well, BPT, take it away!

Infosys’ Siebel BPT Solution counters the customer challenges faced during manual testing and traditional automation testing. Deployment time for Siebel Implementations can be significantly reduced using the solution which in turn helps in faster go-to-market of the product.

Infosys’ Siebel BPT solution is aimed at addressing four key business imperatives:
–Reduce Siebel Implementation costs by cutting down on the functional testing cost.
–Reduce Implementation cycle by cutting down on the build time for the function test suite.
–Reduce Upgrade/Maintenance costs by minimizing modification to the existing suite
–Ensure Complete Functionality coverage by an exhaustive library of pre-configured components

Key challenges that customer faces with traditional automation testing
–Dynamic business scenarios and tighter budgets demand faster time-to-market for Siebel application rollouts.
–Test Automation suites often break every time there is a new release and require significant investment in maintenance
–Defect creep through into production due to inadequate test coverage
–Excessive setup time & cost for functional test scripts, both manual & automated
–Project delays and cost over runs due to regression testing.
–Disparity between business team’s needs and QA’s functional testing

How Infosys’ BPT Solution addresses these challenges:
–Provides Siebel customers with pre-configured test sets that can be quickly deployed to validate key business processes
–Provides re-usable test components used to perform end-to-end testing for multiple releases of an application with minimal maintenance effort
–Suite of standardized templates and best practices along with accelerators such as estimation tools will provide a comprehensive automated testing solution

We will be showcasing this solution at the upcoming HP Software Universe (June 16-18, 2009), do visit us at booth no. 208 for getting a first-hand feel of this product and to talk to our solution experts.

 

Identity resolution – Strategic goals for an MDM implementation

Recently I was watching the movie “21” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_(2008_film)) in sitcom, where students from MIT including a professor was able to use probability and sign language to win millions of dollars from multiple casino houses based out in Las Vegas. The movie featured usage of technology and manual investigators to help resolve the “identity” of the fraudsters using data points, and finally resulted in each of them being caught. So what is Identity resolution? As an organization it is an ideal objective to reach the strategic level in an MDM implementation. Identity resolution is basically driven out of the strategic usage of MDM implementation. Identity resolution means able to truly identify an individual based on his/her relationship.

Theoretically every person is connected to every other by at least “7 degree of separation”, so how one person identity gets resolved is dependent on his/her relationship with others, in the sample universe. Identity resolution is very critical to be used in tracking high risk candidates, who have the inherent ability to expose an organization or country to high collateral damage or risk. Identity resolution is usually done based on the relationship and anonymous factors where every individual is evaluated based on relationships which are intrinsic and extrinsic. Identity resolution is heavily leveraged in casinos to prevent a scenario I have depicted above. Insurance firms and banks are using Identity resolution techniques to evaluate the risk propensity of the candidate and are investing heavily to eliminate the exposure to these risks. When we performing Identity resolution we refer to terms such as false positives (the inference is arrived at as identifical match, when it should not have been the same) and false negatives (the inference is identified as dissimilar match, when it should have been the same).

I was inspired by a blog by Dan power (http://www.identityresolutiondaily.com/527/the-growing-role-of-identity-resolution-in-mdm/) where he mentions in detail the growing role of Identity resolution in MDM. Various vendors have tried to capture this space with IBM, providing a major marketing initiative to various governmental agencies in India about the Entity Analytical System (EAS) based solution.  Informatica has recently acquired Address Doctor to build heavily on the Identity resolution capability. The digital asset and foot print left by each of us in the Internet (be it Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Xing, etc) will now have a major implication on how our Identity gets resolved. Big brother is watching us, so let us be aware on what crumbs we leave in the digital world.

June 11, 2009

Convergence: The Customer Perspective

By Ravi Agarwal 

In whatever we do as a business, the end goal is to get a happier customer resulting in more business. The primary element here is to know exactly what the customer wants / would want in the future – every year from now on say for the next 10 + years and be the first player in the market to lure the customer with that need / product / service. It is in this context that it becomes important to look at convergence keeping the customer perspective in mind. The key business drivers are around customer centricity, synergies and brand value.

The first step of convergence is the fusion of the marketing of the products of either the triple players (Voice, Video, and Data) or quadruple-players. (Voice, Video, Data and Mobility). Beyond quadruple play, convergence starts assuming a significant change in approach and implementation – both in terms of vertical convergence and horizontal convergence.

So what is convergence from a customer perspective? To an end customer, the limits of convergence are endless. The customer needs:

• All the possible services as a single entity
• A single bill (converged bill for family accounts)
• Option to choose one or more or part or whole of those services.
• Best user experience within the services
• Use based pricing model

These customer needs can be best explored in the context of three key areas:

Have  a single equipment in their static location which caters to all his different needs of communication, related to media and entertainment (called Static Device). Do we have such a single device today?

Have a single equipment while they are on the move, dynamic location, which caters to all his different needs of communication, media and entertainment (called Dynamic Device) Do we have such a single device today?

Single Customer Care Program for the needs: Are we running this at an optimal level to the satisfaction of the customer? The exploration of each of these items needs to be looked in depth:

Static Device: e.g. Cable, Internet Services, DVD Player,CD Player, Palmtop, Laptop, Wireless (Phones, Features), Land Line, Ability to access one/multiple features for different family members and others, Media channels and information, Entertainment (Games etc.)

Dynamic Device: e.g. All the features of static device + Portability

Single Customer Care Program:  e.g. Flexibility and Innovativeness of Plans and Pricing, Simple and Easy Billing, Scalability and Family Pricing.

Convergence is a varied area and every stakeholder has some benefit or the other for themselves. The customer perspective holds a prime importance for the near term and long term solutions in this space. A lot has been discussed towards benefitting service providers due to reduction in operational costs, exploring new revenue earning models and joining hands for both hardware and software. The customer needs to be kept in the center while exploring such scenarios.

The time ahead will be a time for providers who can keep pace with the customer needs. A very good example is the successful launch of iPhone. There needs to be a dedicated focus to analyze the customer needs and build solutions around the same. That will govern how the future businesses shall proceed.

This leads us to ponder on some key questions which might be the trend for the future:

• Is  a software interface possible/available which can consolidate the multiple devices that an individual uses or atleast allows it to switch between these options?
• What could be a best billing mechanism to the customer, the easiest format – which is also cheaper to the providers? Can we have a standardized billing format which is easy, simple to use based on multiple client inputs – and have an interface which can provide such a bill to all?
• What are the features that the consumer needs for his/her static/dynamic device?
• How can all the multiple entities generate money out of this end convergence need?
• What is the current state of the market on the equipment convergence (static) front? Does it provide the business scope?
• What is the current state of the market on the equipment convergence (dynamic) front? Does it provide a business scope?

The thoughts continue but the focal point remains only one: The Customer. That is where all the solutions, pricing, features and focus should converge – this is true for the service provider, this is true for the device makers, this is true for the associated applications and this holds true for business.

 

About the Author

Ravi Agarwal is a Senior Project Manager in Enterprise Business Intelligence and Corporate Systems Applications. He has 12 years of experience and has been associated with developing customized CRM applications and working closely with clients on consulting assignments. Ravi is a certified internal quality auditor and has to his credit various thought papers in international forums, and a (grant pending) patent.

 

June 10, 2009

Are you able to measure your Marketing department’s effectiveness?

Marketing Effectiveness - a term that’s conspicuous with its absence in most organizations is gaining importance in today’s recession hit world. Marketing departments, traditionally a cost centre, are being asked to objectively demonstrate the impact of their marketing activities.

Traditionally the measurement of marketing activities’ output has been done through metrics like brand awareness, campaigns and events responses etc. Due to the subjective nature of these measures, the task of evaluating marketing department’s performance becomes difficult and quite often, organizations end up either aligning marketing goals to sales or setting subjective targets for various activities. The problem with both these approaches is that the organizations are never able to ascertain the exact dollar value that various marketing activities contribute towards the top line as well as the bottom line.

Managers across the industries are faced with some fundamental questions:

  • How can a marketing manager know in quantitative terms if it is better to invest cash in a brand-building campaign versus a sales promotion campaign?
  • How can they know which campaign was most successful with which kind of target audience?
  • How else can they segment their audience for a future campaign if not by analyzing the performance of their past ones?
  • How would they derive some learning out of their past marketing activities if they are not tracked by well defined KPI’s?

At broad level, the marketing activities can be divided into 2 categories; one, that have a defined audience and two, which are targeted at mass audience. While it becomes difficult to objectively measure the effectiveness of second category in pure dollar terms, measures like Return on Marketing Investment (RoMI) and Lead conversion can be effectively used to answer some of the above questions for the first category.

Here some would argue that a scenario like this is not ‘walk the talk’ as many campaigns would not show immediate results or are fraught with difficulties like capturing the orders tied to a campaign across different sales channel.

But the fact remains that any initiative that needs to ensure that a robust and objective model for Marketing Effectiveness is implemented has to be backed by clear strategic intent to implement a Closed loop Marketing structure (consolidated Marketing and Sales lifecycle) that ties your campaign to responses, response to leads, leads to opportunities, opportunities to orders and orders to revenue, using clearly defined metrics.

Irrespective of process optimizations and cost prohibiting factors, the truth remains that every organization’s marketing unit has to shed old theories and be innovative to effectively measure their marketing revenue.

June 09, 2009

Where is CRM on the Cloud?

On Demand applications have long been the ‘Cloud’ face of CRM. This software as a service model still is the fastest growing CRM application deployment model. There have been numerous arguments about the feasibility and the cost effectiveness of the SaaS model. Nevertheless, the technology has developed over the last decade and users now are fully aware of how the model can play into their CRM roadmap. Then the storm began to brew over the ‘Cloud’. A pertinent question keeps popping up every now and then: Is SaaS Cloud Computing? For a more detailed view on this please read the blog on Cloud Computing Part 2: How is Cloud Computing different from SaaS?

So where is CRM technology headed to? Towards the end of the last year, Salesforce.com announced the integration of their on demand platform with the social networking site Facebook and with Amazon Web Services. This was touted as the entry of CRM in the Cloud. What this integration does is really interesting. A user will be able to associate a lead in the CRM application to a user in Facebook. This allows the user to get more details about the lead and this is particularly helpful in cold call scenarios. Once a particular person is identified, his/her friends and friends’ friends all tend to share a similar interest and this will go a long way in identifying potential leads for a particular product. So this integration helps in pulling Facebook contact data into the CRM application. And moreover, all the stuff that you normally do on a Facebook page like sending a message, writing on the wall etc. can also be done through this integration.

While all this is nice to hear, there is a void and of course a lot of questions to be answered. Is a CRM executive expected to process generated leads or are they going to keep messaging their contacts and writing on their walls? Or even if they do, how many contacts, especially the enterprise customer contacts will be interested in somebody poking them to sell something? That’s not why they signed up in Facebook. What kind of advantage this integration will bring is anybody’s guess. Having said that, there is no doubt that this kind of integration is definitely a step in the right direction. A lot is already happening in the social networking sites and enterprises will love to have such sites linked to their CRM application. Most companies already a have Facebook page and they do a lot of CRM stuff on their pages. Many questions are being asked by Facebook users and companies strive to clear as many doubts as possible for their customers. Another good integration would be to get these questions as customer service requests in the CRM application and responses getting back to the Facebook user as a post.

But does all this qualify as CRM on Cloud. In my opinion – hardly!

Enterprises can definitely use the SaaS model as long as they are interested in a stand alone model with some basic integrations. But SaaS is just not enough if an enterprise wants to have an end to end business process system in a cloud infrastructure. To expect such a comprehensive system without going through the infrastructure headache will become a normal requirement in the near future.

Users currently having on-premise setups, have control over what they can build and configure. They want to be able to provision and maintain a tightly coupled ERP-CRM business process. They definitely want to have access to the database and prefer the single tenant model. While all this can be comfortably done on-premise, imagine having all this on the Cloud infrastructure. Even better, think about being able to transfer the cloud resident system back to your IT org. And when needed, to be able to transfer it back to the cloud with a different cloud provider.

This ideal scenario will require providers to agree on a set of standards to be able to exchange and access the services freely. There are many such concerns that need to be address before one can think about making this a reality. Before that, there are various steps in the Cloud evolution that we need to go through. Enterprises already having significant investments in their present infrastructure would not want to just throw them away. They should try increasing the efficiency of their available capacity through virtualization techniques. This will enable them to move towards a private cloud setup, where they can get cozy with the concept of putting applications and systems on the Cloud.

Enterprises will look for a mature market where the standards issue mentioned above takes a definitive shape, with acceptable security, a better understanding of the legal and regulatory scenario and more importantly, measurable and manageable SLA regime. For now integrating Web 2.0 features into CRM applications is a start and we will continue to delve into this topic of CRM on the cloud.

June 08, 2009

Business Process Testing - The future of package testing ?

 In today’s recession-infected world, customer-retention has become one of the key factor’s for organization survival. A few organizations have thus renewed their focus on leveraging/enhancing their existing CRM applications to derive and provide more value to their customers. However, the long-drawn market slump has forced organizations to cut-down their discretionary and non-discretionary IT spending. The focus for any new CRM implementation/enhancement is thus on squeezing the overall cost and reducing the deployment time.

Quality assurance constitutes and contributes a major chunk of time and cost during any end-to-end CRM implementation/enhancement.  A well-defined quality assurance plan that includes robust functional testing practices, resources, and tools is no longer a “nice-to have,” but a necessity. Organizations planning to enhance their existing CRM applications have to spend a significant amount of manual effort on validating their regression test bed.

Automation testing using traditional tools such as HP QTP has now been deployed to cut down the overall testing timelines. This testing approach is expected to deliver a decent ROI after a few enhancement releases.

However, traditional automated testing lives with shortcomings such as lack of backward compatibility with existing automation platforms, dependency on automation experts with good programming expertise and higher initial investments of time in development & maintenance of test suits.

HP Business Process Testing is a new approach to automation that allows non-technical subject-matter experts to quickly build, data-drive, and document tests in one Web based system, decreases the need for programming to automate and reduces the effort required for test maintenance by deploying centralized business components.

Infosys’ BPT accelerator – a set of prepackaged business processes, components, tools, enablers, best practices - is built on HP’s BPT framework. This solution leverages Infosys’ domain expertise, CMM Level 5 methodologies and provides a high degree of reusability, which reduces the overall quality assurance effort.

In my next post, I will be providing more details on the BPT accelerator.

June 06, 2009

Empowering the Next Generation Call Agent

I’ve had a hectic & eventful last few weeks, studying call center processes & agents in different types of call centers. I wanted to share some conclusions with this CRM community and take some feedback (and also break a chain of Customer Experience posts from my side!). This post is going to be less about the processes and more about the agents…
 

‘Average talk time’ and ‘Service levels’ continue to be the most significant measures of an agent’s performance. I have to jump into an analogy immediately… these measures are akin to a sales rep diligently tracking ‘SG&A’ as a key metric. These are certainly important & quantifiable metrics but need to be higher up in the pyramid. Levers to achieve good service levels and low SG&As are way broader than what a call agent or a sales rep can significantly influence. For a sales rep, the single biggest measure has been and will always be ‘Top-Line’. This, very clearly, is their raison d'être. I don’t know if we will ever achieve unanimity on this but what is the call agent’s raison d'être?

According to me, the answer is ‘First Contact Resolution’ (FCR). FCR is by itself a very loosely used term – defined and measured in a variety of ways (driven not so much by the business definition but more so by the ability to measure). The call center industry sees a variety of ways by which FCR can be measured. Some of the common methods employed are


a)       Quality monitoring – usually, a percentage of the calls are recorded and played back for quality improvement. Assuming 10,000 calls a month (that would be a small center by the way!), 70% FCR and 50% calls recorded, that translates to 3,500 calls being potential FCRs available for analysis. The flip side? One call translating to 2 mins talk time (on average) would mean that for a diligent study of FCRs in one month, the center will need 100+ hrs of invested time. Though a much smaller sample can give a good measure of the effectiveness of FCRs, this method will still not help in the measurement of FCRs. I would recommend this strongly, but not for FCR measurement month after month.
b)       Customer’s voice – Surveys to the customer (telephone or email driven) to know if their question was answered effectively in the first attempt. Even at a 10% response rate (1,000 calls), a good measure of the FCR can be achieved. That’s 100 responses per agent approx in a 10 person center. Not bad!
c)       Agent’s voice – The agent determines if the customer’s issue was resolved by the end of the customer’s first call. This is acknowledged by the industry to be ineffective – this method is as absurd as a frontline sales person having a final say in his/her sales volume for the month. In addition, the agent may not even be aware of an earlier call from the customer on the same topic if the real-time systems aren’t shrewd enough and the customer hasn’t gone into length that an earlier call was made on the same topic.
d)       Analytics – Evaluate if the customer called back in a given interval on the same request (say, within 5 days in a B2C banking context). This is a tough measure but can be measured if the CRM processes are well defined and a robust front office system is available to support it. Watch outs need to include seasonality (e.g.: Nearing a tax filing deadline) and non-call methods (like a visit to the branch) to get the same issue resolved.


For these measures, I would like to add a word of caution. Don’t leave the definition of ‘FCR’ to your call center. The more ‘open loop’ your call center is, the higher will be its FCR. There is a fundamental difference between ‘answer’ and ‘resolution’. A customer’s request is not to be measured as resolved if the resolution lies with another group, say field service (which involves a visit, say 2 days down the line). FCR targets can be adjusted accordingly but how you define your FCR will have a reflection on your customer’s experience.


Now, why is FCR all that important? How is it superior to talk time and service levels? Here are some reasons (not in any particular order) shared by best-in-class call centers…
1)       Take the quality monitoring example above. With FCR at 70%, 3,000 calls per month could potentially have been avoided if the agent had answered right the first time. That converts to a) 6,000 additional minutes available (note what that can do to service levels directly!) or b) 6,000$ of cost saved or c) 3,000 opportunities for outbound calls/campaigns/cross&up sells (ask your sales guys what that means)
2)       FCR is directly proportional to customer satisfaction. I don’t have too much data on this but I believe the scale will be similar. That is, if FCR goes up to 80%, customer satisfaction will also be somewhere near that figure. Note, this is huge.
3)       FCR is directly proportional to employee satisfaction. To achieve an FCR culture, support processes and systems need to be perfect. If they are perfect, you have a satisfied agent. Less angry callers to deal with on a Monday morning.


Since FCR tremendously influences the customer, the company and the call agent, it really needs to be THE measure of choice for the call agent and their managers. So, does anyone think there is a more important measure?

June 03, 2009

Has your SaaS TCO changed?

It is interesting to see how improvements in capabilities of SaaS CRM applications together with generic developments in SaaS space are impacting Total Cost of Ownership figures for SaaS CRM applications – negatively in some cases. One can see that happening at least in the following areas: Functionality, Integration Capabilities & Resource Availability.

If you were among the early SaaS CRM adopters, you were likely to have assumed that the implementation would be a simple and straight forward one with basic functionality and the associated efforts in requirement gathering, implementation, training, etc. would be minimal. While that assumption was correct then, SaaS CRM applications have been enriching the application functionality over the past few years. In some cases, arguably, I would imagine that SaaS is giving a tough competition to the on-premise CRM applications. I remember how surprised I was to find that one of the on-demand CRM applications was kind of leading when I was doing a research sometime back on the packages for a specific financial vertical - Wealth Management. The lead on-premise applications have here seems to be narrowing – with that the difference in cost of ownership figures as well.

 

 

Similarly, in the integration area, when you estimated the costs associated with integration, you probably assumed either no integration or week-end-batch kind of integration capabilities for the SaaS application. Now, the options are not limited to batch alone. In some cases, the SaaS CRM application is giving you better integration capabilities - like, for instance, with Social Networking Sites. Again, as with functionality, better integration capabilities come at a price - higher costs associated with building and maintaining them. And, hence, you have a higher cost of ownership.

 

 

With SaaS CRM vendors firmly established in the market place, we have more technical talent available now - and more System Integrators who can implement and support SaaS CRM applications. In this case, I would imagine, largely, the impact to be positive as the increase in number of skilled resources means an increase in supply and hence an eventual decrease in price. This decrease in price of resources should decrease the TCO. It is also possible that the impact is negative as there has been a sizeable increase in the number of SaaS implementations as well. With the number of implementations going up, there is an increase in demand. If this demand more than compensates the increase in supply, prices may have been pushed up - thus pushing the TCO up.

 

 

While the above considerations are not going to change the TCO calculations for the past years, I think, companies involved in the TCO analysis exercise now or in the future needs to consider them. Particularly relevant will be scenarios like revisiting the TCO numbers for an implementation which was put on hold.

 

 

Also, more importantly, let us keep in mind that higher TCO does not necessarily mean anything - it is only relative to the original TCO figure of the SaaS CRM application. It may still work out to be lower than that of the on-premise option. Needless to say, one has to consider the changes to the cost drivers of the on-premise TCO as well before a fair comparison can be made!

 

Customer Master Data : Plan or Perish

“Customer” – looks like the most coveted entity in a CRM application. Isn’t it? Of course that is the back-bone of any CRM application, but what if I say that its database is often the primary reason for many CRM implementations failures and lack of user adoption. Sounds intriguing, but it’s true. Turn the clock behind and sense that as users or consultants, have we not found it to be one of the most neglected or maligned entity in the system. Probably yes….

Data duplication, data redundancy, data mismatch, data obsolescence are some of the often seen issues in the customer master data in CRM applications. To compound the problem, visualize the integrated scenarios between CRM and ERP. Chances are that missing golden clients, absence of customer hierarchies, un-mapped customer life cycles processes etc. would be giving headaches to CIOs and business users alike.

 

So where is the solution ? The solution begins with the acceptance of the fact that customer master data needs a maintenance strategy which should be reviewed periodically. SOX based or similar validation checks, identification of golden source clients, proper data archival strategy with periodic data de-duplication or cleansing effort can go a long way to a healthy customer data base, which in turn is the foundation of a successful CRM application.

 

Additional data review or compliance with third party databases like Dun & Bradstreet can also help in keeping your customer master data up to date. Otherwise you would be looking for your ERP vendor “JD Edwards” in your customer master database and its ownership would have already got changed twice in few years time frame.

 

So shouldn’t I conclude by saying that “Customer data devo bhavah”, which means treat your customer master data like a divine entity !!!

June 02, 2009

Social Networks in Business and Commerce - Is it Unprecedented?

With S-commerce, S-networks, S-Analytics and S-CRM and S-anything being the buzzword I wanted to take a step back and analyze whether all this is truly path-breaking innovation? 

A deeper ponder helped me identify that customer has always been the focus of any major marketing, sales or service activities. For decades now, marketers have been practicing concept testing, product testing with a representative sample of target segment to gauge reception to the product / marketing idea. The responses have been analyzed to great detail to predict the behavior post product launch. Listening to the customer, analysis of past customer complaints, buying behavior and psychographics are not new for marketers. Consumers and Customers, especially the ones that are purchasing a high-involvement product or service would invariably exhibit post-purchase dissonance behavior. The need for any customer has always been to minimize the post-purchase dissonance and for several decades now, marketers have through mechanisms like service calls, customer groups or clubs or interactive forums aimed at loyalty  (like Harley Owner’s Group , Dell , Pampers  etc) ensured that the customers have a community to share their buying experience and draw affirmation of their purchase decision.  So what has really changed with the advent of Social Networks in its current form?


What has changed is the power of the buyer and the reach and impact of customer feedback / opinion. Social networks give an endless platform to share the delightful experience and formidable dread of a customer alike. Snowball effect of the word of mouth (positive or negative) is amplified multiple times on social networks than any other media known. Product recalls and failures in design have always been in the media but what has changed with S-Commerce is the pace with which information is shared and its wide reach. The cost of a product defect or poor customer service is amplified with social networks as information spreads immediately making it easier for all your customers to switch if not convinced of recompense. Essentially social networks cannot make an organization more customer-oriented but the already customer –focused can leverage to their best advantage and those who choose to ignore can do so at their own peril.  
 
  At the same time, the reward for delighting your customers is whopping as well. Social Networks has in essence made commerce and business more high Risk and high Returns from a customer touch point perspective. No longer can you afford to brush aside that one unhappy customer you had in the day or one product delivered late. Brand recognition and Dilution happens in a moment – Thanks to Brand Blogging and the power of WOMM!

Does this spell gloom to the marketers?  Not really! Infact your customers are now consultants in disguise who can help you gauge your service levels better, estimate your partners’ competencies, get that most required insight into their needs and wants and tell you what makes your competitors tick. They also make it less risky for you to launch new products by being the ever-enthused co-creators of your new product design or concepts. As WOMMA states good word of mouth marketing strategies involve finding ways to support satisfied customers and making it easier for them to talk to their friends.

Micro segmentation of customers based on benefits is now made easier with social networks increasing your RoMI significantly compared to traditional media. Infact the impact of influencers is so high , thanks to social networks , that Bazzar voice  chose to rename RoI as Return on Influentials

 

 

The impact of Social networks on commerce is not limited to Sales and Marketing but also includes new product or concept development and sample testing.

 

Betty Brottlund’s blog on Companies using Social Networking to Boost Sales  went on to prove the business relevance of social networks to organizations in as diverse  industry segments  as Coca-Cola , IBM, StartBucks , Google , Southwest Airlines , Revlon and GE to name a few. Social Networking Analytics is gaining momentum to decipher the complex yet valuable information hidden under plethora of human interactions in the social networks. Human social networks have never been under so much scrutiny and micro-level analysis as it is now.

 

Benefits of Social networks are not limited to just S-Commerce but also pervades to your own organization, aiding you hear your employees, partners and suppliers for business growth.  Sooner you implement the framework to create an inclusive listening mechanism the greater the rewards. Google, Microsoft, IBM are just a few of the prominent organizations that have employee blogs to listen and create a high performance environment.  Recruitment, Solution Development, Concept Development, Brainstorming on product or service enhancements, Sales Deal Closure, Partner recruitment, Search, Share Best practices, experiences are all enabled through social networks in a seamless way – all with the comfort of where you are – Thanks to Social networks accessible from Mobile phones. More than half (52 per cent) of mobile phone users in the UK are now using the mobile  Internet with email and social networking the most popular activities, according to Webcredible. 

 

Application of Socnets to an organization would perhaps be a topic for another blog that I would come back soon with. To conclude on where I started, I must admit that Social networks have been path-breaking innovation primarily because of the wide-reach, easy access and the powerful impact it has on all stakeholders.

 

It is prudent and in fact mandatory for all organizations to closely follow the conversation in social networks to gauge future trends, opportunities, and problems.
It is very likely that 2009 may well be the year of social commerce as foreseen by TyTribble . I am keen to listen to your thoughts on the same.

June 01, 2009

Cloud Computing Part 2: How is Cloud Computing different from SaaS?

There have been pertinent questions and interesting line of thoughts for the first post on Cloud Computing “Cloud Computing Part 1 : Are we doing it already?”. We will try to put things into perspective one by one. Firstly, lets deal with the confusion related to SaaS. Is SaaS same as cloud computing? More broadly, why is online video streaming, photo sharing and every, literally every, little thing available on the internet are being given as examples of Cloud Computing. Experts and hardliners may not necessarily like the idea of calling everything under the sun as Cloud.

Generally a Cloud offering, targets enterprises. There are many services being offered in the Cloud. Let us take the example of Amazon EC2 services. EC2 is a service across the internet, which provides computing power and the user pays only for the capacity used. The user is in complete control of what he/she wants to use the capacity for. There are numerous examples in the internet, showcasing instances on how a small business was able to quickly setup shop, on how another business was able to expand its capacity for the holiday season and quickly ramp down, paying for only what they used. In these instances, the application that runs and services the customer, is being developed and used only by that small business to cater to its customers. This cannot be called SaaS. SaaS is a pre built application having a pre defined set of features, targeting a specific end use. Companies using SaaS can take advantage of only these features with slight customization to meet their needs. What Amazon EC2 offers is Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) or a Platform as a Service (PaaS). An enterprise using IaaS or PaaS can decide on what OS to use, what DB to use, what webhosting services to use and what application development environment to use. Of course, the choices are limited to the ones made available by the IaaS/PaaS provider.

So how are SaaS and Cloud Computing related? Cloud Computing is nothing but the bigger picture which includes SaaS, IaaS, PaaS, Web services, Utility Computing etc. While this is an attempt to clear the air on these terminologies, there is no consensus on whether they mean the same or how one is different from the other. There are many providers who claim to be offering Cloud services, while they may just be offering just utility computing or SaaS or any one of the variants possible under the bigger umbrella called Cloud Computing.

At the end of the day what matters is what the users want. The Cloud user typically wants to avoid infrastructure related headache and needs a reliable provider to provide him with that facility. If an individual user is interested in just photo sharing or just wants to watch his favorite video on in the internet, then there are providers who cater to such needs. If an online newspaper company wants to store all their articles, they just buy database space and make use of the pay as you use utility computing model. If an enterprise wants to implement a full fledged CRM system, they can choose from the number of SaaS providers. And if a corporate’s IT department doesn’t want to do anything with buying massive servers and maintaining huge data centers, they can just have their developers use the platform provided by the likes of Amazon (EC2), Google (App Engine), IBM (Blue Cloud), Microsoft (Azure) and Salesforce.com (Force.com) and reach out to their customers in the most efficient way. There can be multiple variations of these needs and services.

The four services mentioned above show the evolution of the Cloud paradigm. This revolutionary technology has made the enterprises take note of the potential to save big bucks especially in the infrastructure space.

This series of blogs on Cloud Computing will continue as the concept evolves. Feel free to post your thoughts on this as we together try to understand how this buzz takes shape in the future.

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Infosys on Twitter