An online forum for thought leaders to discuss the challenges and opportunities impacting the changing world of banking.

« March 2010 | Main | May 2010 »

April 16, 2010

Risk-free Transformation - A No Stress Journey!

Costs are rising consistently and margins shrinking rapidly; economic conditions are shaky at best and customers are but willing to change sides in the blink of an eye - the picture is far from rosy. Banks can barely circumvent the need to streamline their technological rudder. If their back end systems are ageing and fail to provide much needed agility, cost-effectiveness, flexibility and scalability then a core transformation is definitely in order.

I am of course not disregarding the associated risks that can deter even the strongest - enormous IT risks, transformation impact on stakeholders and the 'What if it fails' syndrome.

So, with banking transformation being mandatory but risky, what are banks to do?

They can adopt a stress-free approach that mitigates the inherent risks but maximizes the advantages of transformation - the non-traditional phased approach to risk-free transformation. Here, transformation is broken up into a number of phases, defined by the bank according to its business volumes / segment, value and priorities. A bank may choose to transform earmarked low-impact areas of its core first; for instance it may opt to focus on its retail liabilities business first. Alternately, it may look at streamlining business in a particular focus geography that is a primary source of business.

Finacle thought leaders will be discussing in greater detail how to make transformation risk-free and stress-free at the upcoming The Asian Banker Summit, 2010. There shall be a special focus on Technology: Driving Business Value through Innovation. The session will outline the business value to be accrued from technology-enabled innovation, post transforming from legacy to a new-age agile system.

You can also pre-schedule a complimentary consultation session with experts. To know more about this special showcase, please click here.

April 13, 2010

Mobile Banking Gets Modish in UK

*About 14% of mobile phone users in UK use the self-service channel i.e. mobile banking for quick, easy and simple transactions - a trend that doesn't seem to be doing too well. In view of the age old pattern, UK has always topped the self-services chart with Internet banking being widely used as compared to the U.S.A, Philippines, and China etc.

However, yet another research results released in 2010 by the mBlox Consumer Survey states that 37% of UK mobile users prefer mobile banking due to the 'anytime anywhere' aspect.  These stats seem to be sharply dispersed with a note of hope for the mobile banking industry. Most of the customers agree that the daily balance notifications, fraud alerts, suspicious activity notifications and notifications for credit limits, low balance and overdraft encourage them to use this service. 

Follow Global Trends... Not this time!

Everyone wants to be at par, everyone wants to be efficient and everyone wants to definitely save time.  So the customary approach is for markets to follow global trends, including the UK.  But UK service providers have decided to be different and adapt an altered model. This is where monopoly steps in i.e. a common shared services platform so to speak is offered to users. The strategy here is to 'Co-brand' this service through an already existing one. It is set up by subscriber institutions that provide a refined service.                                                                                   
Self-Service or Mono- Service...

Monilink- the dominated or standardized white labelled services offers this facility only to its users - you can access as long as you subscribe. Interestingly, the users can also transfer funds using their phones via the Monilink Backbone. Again, a service rendered only to the Monilink supports - whether it is the telecom users or the banks.

Lowered Expenses Equals Healthier Banks

One may wonder where the banks benefit from. Won't the entire mobile banking infrastructure be costly? It is definitely convenient for the customers but is it the same for the banks? Well, the banks find the tie-up even more cost-effective as Monilink charges based only on their transactions. The time and effort saved are a bonus. Now that is a better payback! It is no wonder then that most of the top UK banks have already registered.

Going a step further, Monilink is likely to strengthen its stance by introducing personal financial management tools which are comprehensive and user-friendly. More features like top-ups, mini-statements, card activation, over-seas transactions etc. only compel the users with efficient results.

Tentative Steps

With all the value added services, convenience and the enhancing attributes, this self-service yet needs a push. The mBlox Consumer Survey states two reasons for this vacillation. The security and the costs. Safety is the first concern users have with all that hard earned money. With the increase in the crime rate involving technology - it only gets easier for tech-savvy thieves. Hacking, text softwares and the list goes on.  Yet another aspect is the cost involved. Not everyone can afford the simple transaction costs.

Keeping in mind the survey results, banks can help in bending the trend towards more usage with a systematic approach. Mobile banking would then be just the 'in' thing to do.

References:
*(Surveyed by MMA and Lightspeed Research during January, 2009)
* February Consumer Briefing Reports (US, France, Germany).

April 10, 2010

Managing Challenges in Bank Treasuries: Agility versus Fragility

With the market facing constant innovations in instruments, more and more complex risks and evermore regulations, it becomes essential for a treasurer to  go beyond merely coping. So, can we create flexible but strong approaches that can manage these and other such challenges? I believe being aware of the omnipresent PPSE risks - People, Processes, Systems and External Events -  might just be the first step in this direction.
Risk number 1 arises from the failure to effectively develop and apply appropriate standards, principles and practices for the recruitment, protection, development, retention and management of employees - The People Risk. Process Risk mainly arises from inadequate design, failure of, or obsolescence of business processes.  Risk 3 deals with Systems, mainly the inadequate selection, development, physical protection and management of systems. Finally, External Events Risks  result in damage to or loss of use of physical assets. 

Needless to say, taking steps to mitigate these might prove to be highly beneficial to financial institutions. Also, few key questions merit serious deliberation - how can we stay flexible and agile in the way we run functions, and not just maximize efficiency and profitability but also have sufficient protection against uncertainties and shocks to the business? 

I, along with Gerald Ashley, Managing Director of St. Mawgan & Co, shall be discussing in depth on how to manage challenges in bank treasuries: Agility versus Fragility - of Systems, People and Processes in a webinar scheduled for 14th April, 2010. The webinar will bring forth the latest thinking in uncertainty management and outlines the new risk tools likely to emerge in the next year or two. We will also highlight the challenges that bank treasurers have to face next.

Please click here to register to attend this complimentary webinar. 

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Follow us on

Finacle on Twitter