Infosys delivers high value global engineering solutions across the product lifecycle value chain. This blog is to discuss trends and best practices around global engineering, global product development, product innovation, product lifecycle management and green engineering aspects across industries.

« November 2009 | Main | January 2010 »

December 24, 2009

2009 - The year of "prudence" in journey of Global engineering

The year gone by was greeted by "financial crisis" and the CXOs across industries were strategizing to deal with this unprecedented challenge at the beginning of the year - focus was on financial prudence and achieving operational efficiency.

 ...But as we end the year, the mood has changed, there is greater hope and some early signs of turnaround...the conversations again are shifting to view this downturn as an opportunity and capitalize on impending growth, prepare to launch new products, adopt more agile and lean business models...

The impact of recession was more in the developed economies. India and China as markets continued to register good growth. In fact this year auto sales in India were defying the economic crisis and bloodbath faced by Detroit, sales have been rising through February this year and recorded 61% growth in November. This all only went to prove that companies will always find new opportunities in this globalized economy.

"Global engineering" concept gained further ground in the recessionary times. I choose to call this year,a year of "prudence" in journey of global engineering, as it put to test the claims and helped to reign unrealistic expectations.

This downturn provided an opportunity to test the "global engineering" paradigm and it is only clear that the companies that leveraged globalization in R&D realized the benefits during the downturn, when the R&D budgets came under axe.  Many a companies did debate what is core to their survival and success - while many embraced globalization of engineering some got an opportunity to rationalize their roadmap and bring back into their fold engineering dimensions what they believed were important to their success, as is the case with some auto OEMs.

The advantages are visible - expanding R&D bandwidth flexibily, sharing reasonable risks and taking advantage of reduced cost structure. Companies were seen exploring opportunities to leverage partner to penetrate the new market. The year also marked the importance of frugal engineering and better asset utilization. Various companies in Retail, Pharma were taking on initiatives to improve manufacturing efficiency and were ably supported by their partners in improving shop floor efficiency. The product portfolio and product lifecycle were also under scanner -  Companies in consumer goods and manufacturing did leverage PLM systems to not only stream line the NPD process but also determine the profitability of product line, spread of portfolio, prioritize new programs and evaluate cannibalization impact of new launches. The companies in China continued to drive down the manufacturing costs, though product ideas were borrowed in many a cases.

The year also brought to fore the importance of engineering value chain. Boeing's global development of Dreamliner did exemplify the delay in time to market (against the expectation at he outset of program) due to issues in value chain. This brought into focus the growing role of the eco-system and need to fix challenges of collaboration and distributed design and manufacturing. The copy designs in China continued to raise IP concerns.

The innovation and technology knew no boundaries - Success of "Nano" a $2500 car by Tata in India.  “LoCosto ULC” single-chip platform from Texas Instruments, "Flypp" mobile application platform from Infosys, hybrid technologies, mobility solutions impacted life of millions. The efforts for sustainability and message from Copenhagen continue to remind us of our interdependence...
This year "Global engineering" has gained more roots in the engineering strategy of the organizations and will continue to drive inclusive growth....

With these thoughts, I signoff 2009. Seasons Greetings! and a great year ahead.....

December 16, 2009

The cost of being Green

While travelling down from LA to Dallas after presentation the Infosys GreenPLM offering at the GlobalTex conference, I had a chance to browse the greenbiz.com".  website . The good thing about this website is the news section dedicated on Green information & updates  across the globe.

Read the article "Recovery Act Adds 6,500 Greener Vehicles to USPS Fleet". And was quite excited to see the big step taken by USPS. This shows the commitment of US Government towards Green. The agency USPS ordered 14,105 fuel-efficient vehicles last month at a cost of $210 million. Quite an amount to be spent and this kept me thinking how much does it cost to be Green?

In addition to automobiles, the common gadgets that we use in our daily life like mobiles, mp3 players, DVD players, camcorders  and so on are all also built using materials which are currently under green compliance radar. Now, it makes me wonder that how much of compliance can we actually bring in to develop green components and will it be cost effective? Having experience of various manufacturing process my personal opinion is that we can actually make greener products however we may not be able to produce something completely environmental friendly. And that would be too hypothetical statement.

I thought about it and came to the conclusion that there are various ways where one can actually reduce cost and still develop a green product or rather I should say a  cost effective green product. For example, while take back and dismantling the product it is easy to identify the components which can directly be reused, some other could be re-manufactured ( well trade-off has to be decided on cost i.e. whether it is cost effective to produce new one or re-manufacture the old one) and some can be disposed off responsibly.

This was at the end of life and the best part is if one can consider greener aspects while designing the end becomes more friendly and easy. That again re-instate the fact that trade-off at the beginning can actually give leverage at the end.

Bottom line: More responsible the producer is, the more greener and cost effective products can be expected from them.

 

 

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Follow us on

Blogger Profiles

Infosys on Twitter