At Infosys, our Insurance, Healthcare and Life Sciences teams strive for holistic, better and safer healthcare through the technology we create. In this blog, we will discuss healthcare IT, obstacles, successes, new ideas and much more, with the aim of improving healthcare technology, and quality of life as a result.

« Implementing ICD-10: How It Can Help to Reduce Cost and Improve Quality | Main | ICD-10 – so what are the ideal timelines? »

HIPAA 5010 – Tactical vs. Strategic Implementation

Cheapest option to compliance – who wouldn’t be interested? Especially in an industry that potentially spends more than a quarter trillion dollars per year on regulations. In the case of HIPAA 5010, developing just the ability to send and receive 5010 transactions will achieve basic compliance and is arguably the cheapest option. I wouldn’t be too hasty to call the organizations that plan for basic compliance as short-sighted, but at the same time I’d recommend that organizations at the very least perform an assessment before heading that path.

Converters are one option to achieve basic compliance. Implementing a step-down converter for inbound files and step-up converter for outbound files, right at the gateway will allow you to keep your internal processes unchanged and achieve compliance.

Updating the front end systems to map the new 5010 files to the as-is database schemas is a little more strategic than converters, but still not strategic enough to realize the benefits of 5010.

These tactical options sound appealing at the first glance, but the devil lies in the detail. Either option can’t guarantee that your backend systems won’t need any change at all. You’ll need to analyze each change in 5010 closely to find out if you can do without any backend change. After an assessment, you might just find out that the tactical solutions are nearly as expensive as the strategic solution.

The strategic solution would entail assessment and remediation of the impact on all the frontend and backend systems. This option will be expensive, but will also avoid applying short-term band aids that eventually make the systems inflexible and expensive to maintain. 

All in all, a detailed assessment should be performed to find out which option is better for your organization. Even if you choose to implement a tactical solution, the detailed assessment report will help your testing phase and will serve as a reference if you decide to update your backend systems at some point in the future.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.infosysblogs.com/apps/mt-tb.cgi/1367

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Please key in the two words you see in the box to validate your identity as an authentic user and reduce spam.

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Follow us on

Blogger Profiles

Infosys on Twitter