Infosys Knowledge Services enables our clients to deliver on complex processes and monetize their data assets. Knowledge Services like Research, Analytics, Reporting and Legal Services can create multiplier impact to both the BPO and IT businesses. It is the third wave of outsourcing expected to grow to USD 17 billion. Infosys Knowledge Services blog is a platform to exchange thoughts, ideas and opinions with Infosys experts on Knowledge Services.

« January 2010 | Main | March 2010 »

February 24, 2010

Euro – a Greek tragedy

Dubai, as I said when the specter of default loomed large, was symptomatic of a bigger global problem of a sovereign debt crisis. Greece is symptomatic of the problem that the Eurozone (and, by default the Euro) currently faces. Success of Eurozone depended on strict internal discipline by the members. Problem was the different stages of economic growth in different countries. Fact is, many of those nations who aspired to be a member of the much avowed group of countries, did not really care for the discipline expected out of them. The problem was exacerbated by the fact that there was a uniform monetary policy across members as was the uniform deficit target. Sure France and Germany sent out wrong message by violating the deficit targets without inviting sanctions, thanks to the clout they enjoyed. The smaller economies thought that they would continue to enjoy the benefits of being a member without being disciplined. The credit fuelled growth enjoyed by them without the adequate checks and balances meant that, when the global environment turned around for the worst, they paid a heavy price for their lack of discipline. And they did not have ammunition to fight given the centralized policies.

Make no mistake, the PIGS (Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain) economies are in real danger of sovereign default and the only way that can be averted is by forcing all of them to drastically reduce the deficit, meaning to say that the government should cease to play the role of propping up the economy. In the current environment, this would lead most of these economies into another bout of recession. And this will pull the others alongwith. Also, as the risk perception increases, it can lead to an increase in risk premium in the interest rates, which can also slowdown the recovery process.

 

Essentially what this means is that Euro will continue to be weak. And, by default, the US dollar will strengthen, more so given the likely flight to safety. Since its December low, the dollar has already gained more than 10% vis-à-vis Euro and as a result, the trade weighted dollar index is also moving up. My feeling is that, the dollar will generally remain strong, although it will continue to be volatile, given that the US economy itself is on a weak wicket. However, sustained weakness of the dollar is not on the cards now.  

February 17, 2010

Euro and beyond

The fact that Greece has bluffed its way (namely fudging data to show strong balance sheet) to join the Eurozone is well known. However, as new skeletons tumbled out of the cupboard, it seemed that Goldman Sachs was its partner in crime. It helped Greece raise $1 billion of off-balance-sheet funding in 2002 through swap deals, something that the European Union regulators claim that they were absolutely unaware of. While corruption in the Greek public sector is well known (which, we Indians, can fully understand), their messy financial situation landed them in even greater trouble being part of the Eurozone, given the lack of independence of their monetary and, to a great extent, their fiscal policy.

Fact is, the extent of debt that has been run by (among others) the PIGS economies have made their countries highly vulnerable. Not that all the others are in a good shape, but the PIGS economies epitomizes the problems the profligate economies (that cannot self correct) face.

Surely, Greece, as a nation is in clear need for a bailout. Default (even a technical one) would be catastrophic. CDS spread of Greece has skyrocketed to 400 basis points plus. As a rough estimate, about €300 bn worth of Greek bonds are outstanding in the global market. Overall, as the sovereign rating of the vulnerable countries (Portugal and Spain are also facing increasing pressure) take a beating, the interests rates would start to rise. And the problem will not be restricted to the few countries only. Even the biggies would be affected. In case of Germany, for example, in the past about 6 months, the CDS spread more than doubled. As per the BIS data, total exposure of the German banks in the PIGS economy (Ireland, instead of Italy) is close to a quarter of their total exposure in developed Europe and nearly 15% of their total global exposure. Meaning, the impact of the vulnerable economies would be increased interest rates, something that the entire region can ill afford at this point in time, when recovery is of paramount importance.

On the other hand, bringing the deficits down (which should be the prime focus) substantially in a shorter period of time (as is expected of Greece or, for that matter, already implemented by Ireland) to enable these economies to meet the requirements to be part of the Eurozone, can lead these economies straight into recession as the Government has to stop supporting the economies fairly soon.

 

 

Not surprisingly, there is now increased clamour about a dual currency in the Eurozone (a strong Euro or the existing one and a weak Euro to be adopted by the weaker economies). Not that the Eurozone policy is to be solely blamed. A significant body of academic research shows that since euro’s introduction in 1999, not only have the periphery countries of the Eurozone not achieve real convergence towards the union’s core countries, they have actually diverged further. Euro-participation provided periphery countries with a false sense of financial security preventing them from pursuing unpopular yet necessary fiscal and structural reforms. And they are paying the price for it.

February 5, 2010

US unemployment – lower rate is a chimera

Picking up from where I left yesterday, the malaise seems to be deeper than what the bulls of the Q4’10 GDP number might want us to believe. First things first. Employers cut as much as 20,000 jobs, when the median market expectation was some positive job creation. It is also important to note that while the gain in November employment was revised up from 4,000 to 64,000, the revised December number showed the job loss plummeting from 85,000 to as much as 150,000 – more than erasing the gains in the previous month.

As per the data leased by the Labor department, the fall in employment last month was mostly driven by a plunge in construction jobs and a drop in state and local government hiring. Although manufacturing employment increased, employers squeezed more out of existing workers by making them work more as is reflected by the increasing average work week (average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls was up by 0.1 hour to 33.9 hours in January, with the manufacturing work week rising by 0.3 hrs to 39.9 hrs). In fact, since June, the manufacturing workweek has increased by 1.2 hours. The factory overtime increased by 0.1 hour over the month. Not surprisingly the productivity has been rising.

The extent of the problem can be gauged from the fact that the number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) continued to rise in January, reaching 6.3 million. Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of long-term unemployed has risen by 5.0 million. Getting job has become so difficult now that the average duration of unemployment has crossed 30 weeks for the first time, meaning people who lose job, remain unemployed for an average of seven months plus, and that’s big. Not surprisingly, the number of discouraged workers (as part of what is called marginally attached) increased to 1.1 million in Jan’10 as against 0.7 million in Jan’09 and the remaining 1.5 million people marginally attached to the labor force had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities.

Hence the drop in unemployment number, despite in unemployment is more technical in nature as some section of the unemployed (who were surveyed) have not looked out for jobs during the past 4 weeks (the period on the survey) and hence did not qualify as unemployed.

While this anomaly might be rectified next month, unemployment rate might not increase much next week given the firms have now become so lean (by cutting headcounts and increasing productivity of the remaining), they would need to add some workers as inventory restocking starts.

However, unless the demand picks up to sustain rising production from mere restocking to meeting rising demand  (which is quite unlikely), the economy is shaping up for rising levels of unemployment a few months down the line.

In any case, the actual level of unemployment is much higher, if we take a more logical gauge of unemployment, which is reflected in the U6 (U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force) numbers and not simply U3 (Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate). The U6 rate is now as high as 16.5%.

February 4, 2010

US initial jobless claims – economy on a sticky wicket

The US economy is in a very sticky wicket indeed, notwithstanding the above expected growth recorded during Q4’09. The recovery is mainly technical as inventory draw down is coming to a close and the inventories have gone to such levels that some restocking is essential. Question is, will the inventory stocking finally lead to production cranking up and economy starting to move up? No, because the consumer sentiments are terribly scythed.

Make no mistake, the consumers are in deep waters and unemployment rates are not going to go down very soon. If anything, there is every likelihood that the unemployment rate will inch up for some more time to come.

The data released by the US Labor Department today shows that Initial jobless claims increased to 480,000 (as against the market expectation of around 450,000) in the week ended Jan. 30, which is the highest in the last seven weeks and up from 472,000 the week before. More importantly, the number of people receiving unemployment insurance hardly changed and those receiving extended benefits actually increased, thereby signaling the difficulty of people landing up with jobs. It is also important to note  that, the number of people who’ve used up their traditional benefits and are now collecting extended payments increased by about 242,000 to 5.86 million in the week ended Jan. 16.

However, as restocking slowly starts, capacity utilization has started moving wee bit up, having hit its low by the middle of 2009. Not surprisingly, productivity has started increasing. As per another report of the Labor Department, worker productivity, as measured by output per hour, rose at a rate of 6.2% (annualized) during Q4’09, resulting in an overall increase of 2.9% during 2009, which incidentally is the biggest one-year increase since 2003. Labor costs dropped by 4.4% last quarter and fell by 0.9% during the whole of 2009, which incidentally is the biggest drop in seven years.

Source: BES, BLS

On the upside, the large jump in productivity does hint that some employment generation will take place soon. However, the overall scenario is unlikely to change much and the overall unemployment rate will not come down anytime soon. As the initial claims number suggest, there is a clear lack of confidence that the economic recovery will be sustained. There is every likelihood that the inventory restocking based recovery will run out of steam soon.

February 1, 2010

Indian credit policy and stock market

As I have been mentioning over the last few months, the Indian stock markets were highly overvalued and not supported by economic fundamentals. It was quite clear that the run up was mainly driven by the deluge of external funds flowing into India. The events of the last few days, when the stocks took real beating as the fund flow dried up and even reversed (on the back of some stringent measures that the  US regulators are contemplating), finally exposed the fragile nature of the run up.

The credit policy announced by India’s central bank i.e the RBI does indicate apprehensions going forward. As expected, without tinkering on the interest rates (RBI has left unchanged the reverse repo, repo, and bank rate at 3.25%, 4.75%, and 6% respectively), RBI increased the Cash Reserve Ratio or CRR by 75 basis points (the move will be implemented in two stages with the first 50 bps hike coming into effect on February 13 while the next 25 bps hike will be effective from February 27. This will result in a mop-up of Rs 36,000 crore or Rs. 360 billion by February end). The message was clear. RBI does not want inflationary expectation to be built up. Not that there is an immediate threat to a built up of non-food, non-oil inflation. The current run up of inflation in India is purely due to food price inflation, which is a supply side issue and it is quite well known that the monetary policy is effective only when one needs to work on demand side pressure and not on supply side issues. Moreover, given the muted rise in credit growth (we would be hard pressed to touch a 16% credit growth this year), the CRR hike is unlikely to have any effect on credit growth. It is more a cosmetic decision aimed at tempering inflationary expectation. 

The fact that RBI has not gone for a rate hike is attributable to their apprehension about the growth and more about the economy’s continued dependence of stimulus. Fact is, domestic demand is still heavily dependent on the stimulus. A close look at the IIP numbers show that while there is an admirable growth in consumer durables, consumer non-durables are virtually flat. One would do well to remember that the stimulus measures positively impact the consumer durables. Even an analysis of the Q3’10 (Oct-Dec) corporate performance reveal that while the bottomline has shown strong growth (thanks to lower base effect), the topline is not really moving as desired. This has been the situation in the past two quarters as well, indicating slack domestic demand. At this point in time, any hike in interest rates can spook demand. And there is every likelihood of interest rate rising sooner rather than later, more so given that the RBI expects the inflation to peak at 8.5%. Interest rates need to rise. We cannot have a situation where the real interest rates remain negative. 

The most important decision, at this point in time, is to time the exit of stimulus, given the dependence of the economy on the same. 

The market seemed to have been buoyed by the positive GDP outlook (7.5% growth) of RBI and recovered all of today’s loss and more. Does it mean the problem days are over? Far from it actually. RBI’s forecast  actually seems to be too good to be true. They do not seem to be taking cogniscance of the likely impact of one of the worst monsoon in the last 25 years. Lack of domestic demand is also being ignored. 

From the market perspective, the global economic environment continues to be real threat. Double dip recession is quite likely in the US, Europe is not in a great shape either and Greece may not be an isolated instance. Added to that are the likely hawkish regulatory stance that one is definitely going to witness all over the world. This can impact the flow of foreign funds in a big way. We have just seen the trailer during the last few days the market took a beating. Meaning, going forward, flow of foreign funds would be very volatile. One should be prepared for volatile times ahead. 

Investment strategy should be more stock specific and definitely not the buy and hold type. Booking profits might make better sense on every rise.

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Follow us on

Blogger Profiles

Infosys on Twitter