Off the Shelf provides a platform for Retailers and Consumer Packaged Goods companies to discuss and gain insights on the pressing problems, trends and solutions.

« May 2010 | Main | July 2010 »

June 17, 2010

Winning Consumers In-Store - 2

Based on my last post , I think we can safely say that the battle for winning consumers at the shelf will be decided by in-store technology and how well it is used. Companies that have deployed this technology enjoy a 360-degree view of real-time shopper and merchandise activity, greater visibility into the efficacy of promotions, and higher engagement as consumers interact with the shelf.

While the technology undoubtedly gives CPG companies a competitive advantage, there are some challenges that companies typically face when adapting to in-store technology:

Analytics: Almost all CPG companies use analytics. However, most of these companies use a hybrid of desktop and enterprise applications. To get the most out of in-store technology deployment, companies will need to optimize analytics systems so that they function consistently across the organization to capture accurate and complete data.

Measuring ROI: This is one of the most important metrics for in-store initiatives, but I'm not sure how many CPG companies have the right tools to measure this accurately. It is a key indicator in determining if existing in-store programs are effective and something you will need to track to ensure you get the results you want from your in-store technology solution.

System Integration: In my experience, I have observed that a majority of CPG companies use piecemeal solutions to support in-store operations. If you're investing in a new in-store technology, it's probably a good idea to have all in-store systems harmonized with each other.

Organizational Limitations: It is critical to create robust data models that teams have confidence in and deploy the right people to analyze model results and data. Without these, even the best technology will be rendered ineffective.

As you can see, preparing to deploy in-store technology is almost as important as the technology itself. Analytics systems, ROI measurement, system integration, and organizational limitations are some of the more important challenges in the process. The benefits of the technology, however, will be well worth it.

June 10, 2010

The Next Facebook Generation (psst...it has a lot of spending power)

Everyone as a child has at least one moment when they think to themselves, "I will not be like my parents."  Although this thought tends to appear in a moment of 'unfair' punishment or discipline of some kind, it does seem to be the beginning of one's fear of growing old.  At the extreme, the elderly are described as being 'invisible.'  The Pharmaceutical industry cherishes this population, but from a retail industry perspective, I cannot argue against the attitude of invisibility.  Gap, Inc. has a brand for every generation of one's life up until the stretches of middle age.  If however, there is a huge demographic shift occurring, why is the retail industry not focused on this population?

 

The baby boom generation is considered to be those persons born between 1946 and 1964.  That means that as of the spring of 2010, these persons' ages range from 64 down to 46.  Some consider the baby boomers to be 'middle age' rather than elderly, but by AARP standards, there is no distinction.  The baby boomers seem to get lost in a retail market no mans land.  With parents who are 60, I wouldn't begin to argue that these folks are slowing down, nor are they receding from trends.  They should not then be ignored.

On one extreme of the boomer group you have Bill Gates and Barack Obama.  No marketer and/or product developer would dream of trying to discount the engagement of these customers.  On the other side, however you have folks like my stepfather, who responded to a post I wrote on his Facebook wall, by responding directly to the email notification he received about it, in spite of the fact that he will sit in front of his computer for hours reading newspapers online.  It's not hard to imagine then that a dinner table conversation will involve the report of some ad that appeared while he read that newspaper for hours online.  My stepfather may not realize that he is supposed to respond by making a post on my wall, nor that he can engage with the newspaper more deeply online rather than in hard copy by reading comments and posting comments, but the time he spends online should not be overlooked by marketers.

Admittedly, watching my mother and stepfather discuss technology is literally like watching a dog chase his tail, or listening to nails on a chalkboard, but I've noticed over the past couple of years as mobility trends have increased and become more fundamental to everyday routines, that their rate of adoption while 'slow' and unpredictable by young standards, is incredibly loyal once it occurs.

The trouble then, is that you have two extremes in one target audience group.  For marketers and product developers alike, this poses the question of whether you segment the market or find products/strategies that appeal across the entire population.

A report from a Forrester survey conducted last fall found that compared to their Gen Y counterparts (ages 18-29), boomers will spend more time shopping around online before making a purchase.  However, more than half of boomers find brand names to be more important than price when making a decision.   This is important when you consider the distribution of wealth held by baby boomers.  Tom Mann of TR Mann Consulting, which specializes in marketing for boomers, says, "[baby boomers] control the bulk of the nation's wealth . . . and they shop! According to a recent study by Nielsen and Hallmark Channels, households with baby boomer members account for nearly $230 billion in sales of consumer packaged goods and represent 55% of total consumer packaged goods sales."   Additionally, recall that the baby boomer generation was the first generation of disposable income.  They were the first generation to believe that a new, fresh wardrobe should be purchased every season.  It is no surprise then that they continue their shopping ways online.  Product developers should take heed.

Marketers then are challenged with understanding the activities of this audeince: if they like to shop so much and they aren't browsing to find the lowest price, what then are they spending their time browsing on?

Perhaps they are consuming more social content than expected.  Indeed, according to Jeremiah K. Owyang, about two thirds of boomers are actually consuming social content.  They are hardly engaging with it by Gen Y standards, but between 2007 and 2008 engagement more than doubled.   Mobility strategies therefore should make sure to include the boom generation in their target audience even if boomers are not actively engaging with the social content.  This will be especially true given that the recent growth of Facebook has largely been attributed to this boomer generation, specifically female baby boomers.

If you are still skeptical that the barriers for adoption are too stark for net-new boomers to engage with social media, consider the fact that as of November 2009, 59% of the boomer generation was employed full time compared with the 51% of the general population.  In fact, the young boomers (aged 44-53) engaged with the internet at work more frequently than either Gen Y or Gen X.  This means that while they did not grow up on computers and on the internet, they are increasingly gaining the necessary skill set to engage with and capitalize on mobility.

Lastly, if retailers do not address the baby boomers in this generation, perhaps they should be aware that as the baby boomer generation begins to pass away, an enormous transfer of wealth will occur in the country.

What then are retailers doing to specifically capitalize on the very loyal market segment of baby boomers today or their children tomorrow?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[i] Mitskaviets, Ina. "Online Baby Boomers: A Demographic Profile". Forrester. November 2, 2009

[ii] Mann, Tom. "Marketing to Baby Boomers and the Mature Market". http://www.trmann.com/documents/MarketingtoBabyBoomersandtheMatureMarket.pdf.

[iii] Owyang, Jeremiah K.. "How to Reach Baby Boomers With Social Technologies". Forrester. January 23, 2009.

June 8, 2010

Winning Consumers In-Store - 1

For as long as I can remember, influencing opinions and guiding decision-making at the point of purchase have been key objectives for CPG companies. However, recent developments in the global economic landscape and rapidly evolving technology are gradually increasing the need for CPG companies to engage consumers at the moment of truth, in-store.

Why CPG companies are focusing on in-store interactions?

Here are some of the reasons I can think of -

    • Consumers are now spending less in the wake of the recent financial meltdown. As a result, they have turned to private labels to maximize return on spends further weakening any brand loyalty that may have existed. Without compelling brand engagement at the point of purchase, CPG companies will continue to lose out to private labels.
    • Mass broadcast marketing is passé. That's because the mass audience doesn't exist. Consumers are now organizing themselves into highly splintered groups based on varying demographics and psychographics. That's why CPG companies are turning to technology solutions that equip them to offer prospects decision-changing, context-aware marketing communication like mobile discount coupons, comparative pricing, and product information, all on the go and, most importantly, at the shelf.
    • Consumer touch points and communication channels have grown exponentially. There is a pressing need for CPG companies to leverage digital-age communication networks such as social media to create a community of influencers who will be able to sway purchase decisions favorably at the moment of truth.
    • Cutting-edge mobile technology and 3G handsets that enable features like location-based services, mobile TV, and video-on-demand have given consumers the power to access product information and pricing in real-time at their fingertips. However, intelligent CPG companies are utilizing this capability to engage and interact with prospects in synch with in-store technology like cellular digital signage to enhance the shopping experience.

Do you think there is much more to this list? Do let me know.

While some might say the challenges are many, these developments offer CPG companies the opportunity to leverage technology to enhance brand value, connect with consumers more than ever before, and initiate personalized promotions that people will value.

To win at the shelf, CPG companies will need the right tools to direct a consumer's shopping experience and engage them interactively using best-in-class technology.

I'm in NY today, to attend the CGT Sales & Markeing event, and am hoping to catch up with senior leaders and experts from the industry. I'm sure interesting conversations will come up and I'll keep you posted.

June 4, 2010

Social Retail: The Age of Consumer Conversations

Social media networks such as Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter are beginning to change the way CPG companies market their products. As I mentioned in an earlier post about the rising prosumer , product information and opinions have been democratized. Consequently, traditional mass marketing campaigns have been rendered expensive and ineffective. Personalized, targeted, and context-aware marketing is the new mantra.

Social media penetration has grown remarkably over the past couple of years with Facebook garnering as many users as a decent television channel, roughly 175 million, with Twitter at approximately 75 million. Unlike other media, social networks give marketers an opportunity to understand customer tastes better and, more importantly, initiate a dialogue with them.

Tasti D-lite, for example, has been an extremely popular frozen dessert franchise in the greater New York area for over 20 years. Today, thanks to social media tools like Twitter, they are engaging customers in conversations to gain valuable insights into customer needs, and offering unique promotions like Twitter-exclusive discount coupons to keep them hooked. (Read the full case study here.)

Consumers are now starting to increasingly rely on peer experts and opinion for product purchases. Folks with similar interests are connecting with each other through social networks and forming small, but powerful, special interest groups that can influence others about a product or subject. By becoming part of these groups and addressing their needs, CPG companies can leverage social media to foster relationships with customers and build powerful brand equity.

When used in synch with mobile technology, social media gives marketers the power to engage and interact with customers at the moment of truth when they are making their purchases. It also helps CPG companies to influence purchase decisions by offering relevant and targeted promotions at the right time.

While social marketing and social commerce present a compelling argument for investment, CPG companies still harbor some valid concerns about ROI measurement from such initiatives. Is Starbucks really benefiting from its over 7 million strong fan following on its Facebook page? Probably, but how does one know exactly how much they are benefiting? Challenging questions that we will need to figure out as we go along.

June 3, 2010

A 380 vs. B 787, a similar debate for retailers

In the 2004-2005 with the price of crude at 70-80 USD per barrel a raging debate was on as what is the future of commercial aircrafts. Is it the mega jumbo A380 by Airbus that can transport 600 + passengers from one hub to another hub or a fuel efficient nimble jet  such as Boeing's 787(built with materials used for spacecrafts) that could fly point to point transporting smaller set of passengers cheaper?  Two of the largest aircraft manufacturers were betting on two diametrically opposite strategies. A similar clash is on in the retail world as we speak.

Retailers are barely making it out of the slump of the last 18 months that have hit store sales the hardest and they are betting on two diametrically opposite horses. On one hand JCPenney, Kohls, Macy who often carried national brands in their stores are moving to a concept of offering exclusive brands to their customers. For example Liz Clairbone is only going to sell exclusively at JCPenney; Dana Buchman at Kohls and Tommy Hilfiger only at Macy's. On the other hand Edward Lampert CEO, Sears Kmart is betting on selling exclusive/proprietary brands such as Craftsman and Kenmore outside of Sears for the first time in its history.......


The 'xclusive' corner is citing that shoppers that are loyal to the brand will follow the brand to the store that it is offered in. JCPenney has an increased focus on the 25 to 45 years woman who is style savvy and yet wants to pay the 'right' price, hence the belief is that it will be able to attract a larger percentage of that persona who shop Liz Claiborne to JCPenney. From a Liz Clairborne perspective their cost of marketing, sales and merchandise planning will dramatically go down as they do not have to deal with the army of sourcing and merchandising associates of multiple retailers but focus on better synergy and planning with JCPenney. The only thing to worry about is, will Liz Claiborne be able stand out amidst the 12 private 'power brands' and several other national 'destination' brands at JCPenney?
On the decommissioning of 'xclusive/Proprietary' corner the reason being cited by Sears is that by allowing sales of their marquee exclusive brands such as Craftsman and Kenmore at other retailers such as ACE would allow them to reach a wider range of customers resulting in a significant upside.  The risk for Sear-Kmart however is that, this strategy can potentially decrease the number of footfalls in the store. Will this result in diluting Sears as a 'destination' for shoppers who are seeking Kenmore and Craftsman?

Who do you think will win in this battle of 'xclusive or not 'xclusive?  BTW how many 787s and A380s have you seen let alone flown, in the last year?

June 2, 2010

Cross-Channel Convergence

As consumers we expect CPG companies to provide detailed product information, unparalleled convenience, and best-in-class service whenever, wherever, and however. We want to buy anywhere, ship anywhere, and return anywhere while expecting the service levels to be consistent across channels. We also expect our favorite retailers to know who we are and remember our preferences. This convergence of channels in the eyes of consumers is one of the game changers as discussed in my previous post - The Rise of the Prosumer. Are the CPG companies and retail chains ready to embrace the convergence of multiple channels?

Reality check on cross-channel convergence
Yes, consumers are expecting the channels to converge, but in reality the channels are acting in silos using disparate systems. While each channel may be reasonably successful independently, CPG companies are unable to harness synergies that may exist across channels and enhance profitability.

In addition, there are several other factors that may be impacting - 
    • Organizational structures may create fear of channel cannibalization from various business units.
    • Incentives and commission programs might not promote cross-channel selling.
    • A lack of integrated merchandising, order fulfillment, and inventory management processes will prevent organizations from streamlining operations.
    • Disparate views of a single customer across multiple channels may be hampering CPG companies from making personalized and targeted promotions. 
    • If different technology and applications are deployed for each channel, decision-makers will be unable to develop holistic order and inventory strategies that will help to control costs.
Probably these are some of the reasons that the channels have not converged yet.

Potential benefits of channel convergence
And If studies are anything to go by, research indicates that cross-channel consumers are among the most valuable lot. As a CPG company, you can do a number of profitable things if you achieve true cross-channel convergence - a 360 degree view of consumers, highly targeted promotions, accurate product assortments backed by customer need data and purchasing behavior across channels, better inventory management for all channels, and much more. In a nutshell, you can give customers what they want, when, where and how they want.

Clearly, channel convergence isn't a choice for CPG companies anymore. It is an imperative - one that will build customer loyalty, strengthen brands, and optimize business across all channels. What in your opinion is the biggest hurdle for achieving cross channel convergence? Let me know.

The CGT Sales & Marketing event is around the corner, and I'm very excited to meet the peers and leaders of the industry. My session focuses on the action plans of CPG companies to connect with consumers across channels and I'm sure I'll be listening to the experts from the industry. I'll keep you readers posted. 

June 1, 2010

Next generation Bartering

One day my wife told me that her friend offered her to teach swimming. This was in return for taking care of her aquarium while she was away on vacation.  My wife said 'what an offer', to which I said 'what a Barter'.

The barter system for getting goods and services dates back many centuries. In most cultures the barter system was used before money was created. What makes the barter system even better today than ever before is that it can now be done globally.

There are examples of property bartering system popular in Dubai to swap their lands as per their convenience and deal. Interesting?

Musician Joel P.West launched his record Dust Jacket and the record is available only through the barter system. It mentions that To receive the free download, send in something of your own creation that describes a part of you. It could be a candid thought or a journal entry, a drawing you've been working on for months or a photograph you accidentally took thirty seconds ago. It could be a song or video, an image of something you are building, or it could even be a single word.

I think Bartering is widespread now. In 2008, China signed a barter deal with the Democratic Republic of the Congo worth $9bn to build the country's infrastructure in return for a slice of its mineral wealth. Both parties held the deal up as a win-win. China needs raw materials for its industries and DR Congo does not have the money to pay to upgrade its infrastructure. (BBC, 14 April 2008)

Bartering can also be used by businesses that are seasonal in nature such as resort hotels. A bartered hotel room is more cost effective than an empty one. Bartering thus allows businesses to capitalize on unproductive assets and spare or unused capacity. With a large exchange, it is possible to barter pretty much anything.

Bartering is a win-win situation for the individuals and businesses.  Following are the benefits of bartering for individuals and businesses:

Benefits of bartering for individuals

  • Save money
  • Recycling
  • Build relationships
  • Spring cleaning  

Benefits of bartering for Businesses

  • Conserve cash.
  • Generate new business.
  • Turn excess and idle inventory into useful products and services.

There are several bartering websites which allow online transactions:

U-Exchange

Trashbank

CareToTrade

The Internet Barter Exchange

PeopleTradingServices.com

Freecycle

 

Let's take a plunge to see how these websites work. Few websites allow Items to be exchanged for items or skills, however some of the websites allow transacting with cash as well.  Below table explains the mode along with some examples:

What Can be Swapped?

Items/Skills

Cash

Items/Skills

Items/Skills

Items/Skills

Items/Skills + Cash

 

Example:

Items/Skills

Mode of payment

Textbooks

Cash

Grassmowing

Cash

Computer Repair

Used Games

 

This is growing up at good pace. Infact the barter industry have 450,000 businesses worldwide turning over US$9 billion per annum (barternews.com, 9 July 2009). This has grown up over the past years of recession when there was cash crunch however Companies should focus on utilizing this new mode of commerce and drive innovative ways to do online business and reduce cost.

Can you suggest some innovative ways of bartering which can help various companies in different sectors? I term it as Barter e-Commerce or B-Commerce. What do you think?

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Follow us on

Blogger Profiles

Infosys on Twitter