Off the Shelf provides a platform for Retailers and Consumer Packaged Goods companies to discuss and gain insights on the pressing problems, trends and solutions.

« November 2010 | Main | January 2011 »

December 31, 2010

Ever wondered why one size fits too many?

Variations in actual physical dimensions across diverse apparel brands for the same labeled size is nothing new. That's the case more often than not! There is rarely uniformity in actual physical dimensions for the same labeled size apparel across brands. However, what have become more often, are variations in fit and actual physical sizes for a given tagged size even for the same brand. And here I am not talking about local or lesser known brands but leading apparel and sportswear brands.

 

One reason for such a discrepancy can be that the merchandise may be ticketed incorrectly, for instance a ticket for smaller size may be attached to bigger sized merchandise or vice versa. This can be easily remedied by making necessary corrections to the ticketing and labeling processes. However, another reason for this size inconsistency, which is faulty production, is far more troublesome. Unlike other product types, consistent fit and size are essential for apparel items. In fact these very aspects can differentiate a particular apparel brand from another. With varying actual sizes even for the same brand merchandise, consumers can't rely on the size labels alone and have to take many trails every time they buy apparel items, even when they are of same make and kind! This doesn't present a nice shopping experience to in-store shoppers. Also, given the focus of apparel companies to grow online this issue presents a serious challenge to the industry. Unlike in stores, where you can take trials and select the merchandise which fits you well, online shopping doesn't offer you such a convenience. If consumers are not sure that a particular size will have the same fixed physical dimensions then it's going to discourage them from making a purchase online and offset retailers' online expansion plans.

 

Shortened apparel life cycle and reduced time to market can lead to product inconsistencies and production related issues. Adoption of IT can help in providing big enough window for merchandise production by correctly reading the right demand and market signals. However, this too, may not always suffice given how fast trends and market dynamics change in fashion and apparel industry. More important is to invest further in skills and training of shop floor workers and to strengthen the quality control processes of manufacturers. It appears that maintaining consistency in sizes, an unquestioning expectation in apparel industry, can also become a differentiating factor in today's marketplace.

December 30, 2010

Holiday Season 'Returns'!

With a robust forecast for 2010 Holiday season retail sales (pegged to grow at 3.5-4% YOY Src: International Council of Shopping Centers) it's clearly one of the good times for retailers. With ever increasing product variants seeking to satisfy consumer demand and with ever increasing expectations of customers who are prone to dissatisfaction with slightest changes in product, retailers are faced with a problem of that of how to handle customer returns - more so the Returns Policies and Returns Fraud - which is assuming larger proposition.

With online retailers providing customers with better return policies (to tide over the fact that buyers have very less or no opportunity to touch or feel the product they are buying before it reaches them), and the customers propensity to buy more from retailers with more relaxed return policies (Src: Study Published in MIT Sloan Management Review by Dr. V.Kumar Georgia State University Professor), it's really a double whammy for brick and mortar retail chains.

On one hand they are faced with a problem of better managing customer psychology (having flexible returns policies in a bid to become consumer friendly) to drive more sales and profits and on the other hand is the problem of Returns Fraud which includes (but not limited to)

·         Credit card chargeback

·         Returning Stolen Merchandize

·         Wardrobing

According to a recent NRF Survey on Returns Fraud, the retail industry is expected to lose $17.7 Billion in 2010 up from $14.8 Billion in 2009, a growth of 19.6% YOY. The problem becomes more magnified during the Holiday season with growth in Returns Fraud estimated at $3.7 Billion for 2010, up from $2.7 Billion in 2009 (growth of almost 37% YOY).

So how can retailers respond to the threat of Returns Fraud and still be able to maintain flexible returns policies thereby enticing consumers?

Here is a quick look into some of the recent trends/initiatives that I'm already noticing in this area

1.       To increase more sales and to better manage customer psychology some retailers could alter or are already altering return policies in the following ways

 

·         By Increasing the return period (say from 15 days to 30 days)

·         Removing or reducing restocking fees (from 20% to 10% or nil)

·         Having product category wise return policies ex: Electronic Items could have stringent return policies compared to apparel/toys

·         Offer store credits for merchandize returns without a receipt

·         Actively offer recommendations for replacement item for returns

Some noteworthy examples of policy changes in 2010 includes (src: www.consumerworld.org)

-          Macy's 180 day return policy was changed to unlimited for most items with a receipt

-          Office Max relaxed its return policy on Opened Digital Cameras which previously were not returnable with a 15% restocking fee

-          Best Buy eliminated its 15% restocking fee on Electronics

 2.       On the fraud prevention side, here is a quick look at some of the trends

·         Simplify returns process and encourage replacements

o    1-800-customer service

o    Online web based returns system (for online purchases from a retail chain) which could match the return item against the purchase history.

o    Integrate returns process across channels to provide flexibility for cross channel returns  (ex: buy online return at store or vice versa)

These measures could help dissuade customers from resorting to frauds as barriers to returns are removed.

·         Implement technology driven solution to Track returns transactions to determine whether some consumers are abusing the returns system/process. Mechanism to filter out such consumers whose returns frequency is high (basically abusing the system) and decide on a different exception process.

 

Will these and few other initiatives help retailers counter returns fraud (at least to an extent) and still be able to maintain consumer friendly return policies thereby turning a threat into an opportunity? Let's wait and watch as retailers internalize these initiatives/trends over a period of time.

Also with flexible return policies, the volume of returns is expected to go up marginally. Are the retailers and manufacturers geared up to better handle higher volumes of return items to extract value out of it or will it throw up a new set of challenges for them? Well let me leave it for a different discussion.

December 22, 2010

Better shopper experience and loyalty with QR codes

A casual glance at the soft drink bottle or a can of juice running a loyalty program shows that the whole process and experience of earning loyalty rewards is antiquated. Imagine the number of people who will actually note down the website address and the rewards code, login to the website, register and enter the code to win rewards or loyalty points. The conversion rate must be abysmally low also leading to erosion of brand affinity. What if you could effectively bridge the gap with a simple bar code?

 

QR codes are the answer. With a smart phone and a QR code reader, consumers can scan the code from an ad, a catalog or the product packaging and get automatically redirected to the website or send an SMS with their entry.

 

CPG firms and retailers can embed QR codes in catalogs, print ads and product packaging to enable physical world hyperlinks and mobile tagging to drive up sales. A few applications of QR codes that I'm already seeing in the wild:

 

Shopping:

1. QR codes on products which you browse in stores and you use it for online research for comparison with other products

2. Geocoded QR tags for quicker mapping and store locations

3. Google's Favorite places campaign already has QR code decals in the windows of local businesses that link back to their online websites

4. QR codes on product packaging to enable product replenishment by customers through QR code scans

 

Loyalty:

1. QR codes for rewards (like the code on a bottle which currently has to be entered by logging into a website could potentially be scanned by your smart phone and it instantly takes you to the rewards website)

2. Wine bottles (social wine discovery site) now have QR codes which link you to a website with all information about the wine.

3. Store loyalty cards as QR codes

 

Coupons & Promotions:

1. QR codes for coupons on catalogs and print ads

2. Create buzz around new product promotions

 

Other areas:

1. QR codes in the supply chain to bring in efficiencies (Supply Chain)

2. QR codes to drive traffic to a business' Facebook page to increase customer engagement (Social Media engagement)

 

The fact that you dont need a special scanner and any smart phone with a camera and qr code reader software can read it is the selling point of QR codes. I think the appeal of QR codes will only increase in a world ruled by the ubiquitous smartphone.

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Follow us on

Blogger Profiles

Infosys on Twitter