"We didn't start the fire ... it was always burning since the world's been turning ..." [Billy Joel 1989]. Is SOA the "Same Old Architecture?" or is it "Simply Over Ambitious?" Let's apply SOA's arsenal:: XML, BPM, Services, SOAP, Web Services - to the real world and find out. Let's put out some fires.

« Day 1 at IEEE SCC 2008 Conference... | Main | Future possibilities explored at IEEE SCC 2008 »

Day 2, more break out sessions at IEEE SCC 2008

It was the day of presenting research and industry papers.  There were many interesting topics that caught my attention; but I had the choice of attending only a few as they were mostly running in parallel breakout sessions.  I certainly did not want to miss the sessions that were discussing - management of distributed collaborative centers for executing work requests, change request scheduling, using domain knowledge for service integration, establishing service model from business model and variation oriented engineering... 

As I looked at the program schedule and started marking the topics to attend, it became evident that I was still loomed with yesterday's discussion.  My inquisitiveness - to find answers for those questions had made we choose the above mentioned topics.  Interestingly most of these topics were presented by researchers from IBM.  Most of the discussion was around the capabilities of execution centers, managing resources, an important conclusion that I could draw was that - It is necessary to model work allocations based on execution centers rather than on task and resources.  The resources should however be considered as the capability of execution center.  Further from other session researchers explained the importance change management, knowledge, service modeling and variation based approaches for Service Engineering.  There were few approaches proposed for which I would need more detailed reading.

After the initial excitement about Service Engineering, post lunch it was time for the topic which I have been looking for - Architecture for service based computing.  This tutorial proposed an 'Enterprise Service Architecture' (ESA) and gave the background and stressed on the fact of why this was necessary.  This explored the use of competence theory for answering few important questions that researchers perceived very essential. However, most interesting part of the tutorial was when the authors reviewed various frameworks that could be the basis of ESA.  Few of these frameworks that I remember were Porter's Value chain model, Business motivation model, Strategy maps, i*, and few more.  The tutorial was concluded by highlighting few gaps and setting few more motivations.  This being my area of interest, I feel there is lot research that needs to be put in both from formalizing it and finding ways to apply to real life situations.

The day ended with a simple and quite banquet, a regular tradition at any conference....

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.infosysblogs.com/soa-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/68

Comments

I am sure you had an enjoyable Hawaii trip :-)...You mentioned that there were various frameworks presented as a potential basis for ESA. TOGAF has been working on SOA RAs. Do you think the work going on in the Enterprise Architecture area would have implications for the derivation of the ESA? If yes, it would be interesting to know more about it...

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Please key in the two words you see in the box to validate your identity as an authentic user and reduce spam.