The Infosys global supply chain management blog enables leaner supply chains through process and IT related interventions. Discuss the latest trends and solutions across the supply chain management landscape.

« Designing optimal customer order allocation by taking into account of inventory fluctuations can be quite complex.... | Main | What’s the right forecasting approach in the current business environment? »

Does the Procurement Boardroom wilt under supplier pressure in a downturn economy?

Well, this is a question most Chief Procurement officers (CPO) dread to dream and a hard fact most suppliers rejoice furtively. In an economic environment, where the manufacturers are under tremendous pressure to cut costs, their over-dependence on suppliers, tilts the balance of browbeating power in favor of the suppliers. Will the CPOs collaborate to beat the onslaught from their suppliers? The economic crisis is forcing manufacturers to redefine strategies for strategic Procurement.

Whereas the manufacturers see a dwindling demand in the consumer market, the suppliers feel more assured in a B2B environment. They enjoy the flexibility to take the same components to multiple customers (manufacturers) at the same price. So, I strongly believe that whereas the manufacturers reel under the crunch of the buyer’s market, the suppliers enjoy a seller’s paradise.

Platform is the magic mantra for the suppliers’ success. They follow a modularization strategy for their components which can be configured to customers’ requirements, with a commonized core. These suppliers have mastered the art and science of platforms, which the manufacturers or product assemblers are struggling to decipher. To counter these product platforms, it is only the Collaborative Procurement Platform (CPP) among the manufacturers which can create a breakthrough. In a CPP environ, the buyers of multiple manufacturers join hands to evaluate their aggregate demand for such platform components, at prices commensurate with economies of scale. For example Toyota, Nissan, Ford and GM can come together on a common platform for buying “60~70 Amps Internal Fan 3-phase square winding gradual excitation Alternators” from the likes of Denso, Bosch, Mitsubishi, Valeo, Visteon etc.   Emergence of such CPP would commoditize suppliers’ components. Suppliers would be beaten hands-down at their own “commonization” game.

To develop such a platform among multiple manufacturers, a strong framework of process, governance, evaluation and communication is necessary.

Process: A standardized process with clearly laid down business rules is necessary to bring in the element of fairness to all participating entities.

Governance: Since most competitors are being brought together in a common commercial platform, governance mechanisms like price-protection-norms, multi-party contractual obligations etc. are necessary, to prevent and avoid law-suites.

Evaluation: Evaluation of price-performance merit for aggregated demand needs to be carried out meticulously, so that there is benefit to all participants in the platform.

Communication: Transparent communication is THE most necessary condition to build trust and maintain a healthy synergy among cut-throat competitors.

In this economic crisis where the manufacturer’s marketing folks are on a warpath to retain market share, it seems a myth that their purchasers would collaborate. Do you also believe this “collaboration among competitors” is a possible survival strategy for any Strategic Procurement initiative in this downturn?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.infosysblogs.com/supply-chain-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/92

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Please key in the two words you see in the box to validate your identity as an authentic user and reduce spam.

Subscribe to this blog's feed
Are you using SAP APO? for supply chain planning?

Infosys on Twitter