The Infosys global supply chain management blog enables leaner supply chains through process and IT related interventions. Discuss the latest trends and solutions across the supply chain management landscape.

« Dilemma of Supply Chain Planning in an Allotment scenario - 3 | Main | Is the new found focus on Marketplace, the end of the road for core Order Management? »

Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSCO) – How to manage multiple supply chain dilemmas

I have always wondered about how a Supply Chain head is able to manage multiple strategic issues simultaneously and what could be the approach that he/she could be taking to drive critical projects or initiatives to tackle most of such issues. There are various questions that I have in mind and would like to seek your opinion for each of them. Questions like:

  • How does one identify the issues that are more critical? What are different parameters that influence issue identification process?
  • What’s the approach for deciding the list of best-fit actions?
  • How does one prioritize these actions – what’s the typical decision framework?
  • How does one decide the modus operandi – what could be the best operating model to execute those actions at the ground level?

 

I am not sure if I have answers for all of them and I do believe that the answer for each question will vary across companies since every single company differs in the way it is structured and the way it operates. But these questions are equally valid for all companies. Generally speaking, what has been your experience? Put yourself in the shoes of a supply chain leader and then think about your approach within a set of constraints, uncertainties and performance pressures that a CSCO has to deal with.

In my opinion, there is less science and more experience involved when it comes to taking such strategic decisions. It has to be an optimum mix of data analysis with sheer gut feeling, business instinct that supply chain leaders develop over a period of time.

 

Issue Identification:

This is the one of the biggest dilemmas that a CSCO must be facing. It is an ever-changing environment and supply chain function continues to face numerous challenges, so how does a CSCO know which ones are important and critical from business perspective? You read any research report or a survey or talk to a supply chain head and you would see/hear a host of supply chain challenges. In one of the recent study done by a leading consulting company in supply chain domain, they listed more than 15 supply chain challenges faced by top management across multiple industry segments and geographies. Needless to say, it is imperative to define an approach to scrutinize these challenges, and filter out the ones that really matter to the business. In one of the leading global organizations, I met a dedicated team of supply chain specialists who work with the CSCO in doing this kind of analysis and provide a scientific approach to the entire issue identification process. The CSCO adds his experience and internal organization-specific nuances to it before coming out with the final prioritized issue list. This could be just one way to manage this.

 

Identify and Prioritize Best-fit actions:

After one has identified the prioritized issues, the next challenge is to come out with a set of focused solutions to handle those issues. Now, how does one arrive at it? And this is one of the areas where consultants come and make a difference. I have also seen supply chain leaders doing a benchmarking exercise to identify big improvement opportunity areas and then pick appropriate solutions. But is it really so simple and straight-forward? There could be so many different ways of tackling an issue and there would be complications when there are interdependencies and constraints involved? So, amidst all this, how is a CSCO able to identify the set of solutions that provide a good business case? Isn’t there a possibility of picking the wrong ones due to organizational dynamics and performance pressures?

 

Execution:

And now the most difficult of all – the execution phase. Most of us have worked with multiple clients in this phase. How does a CSCO operationalize the action items and govern all of them effectively? There are so many factors such as geographical presence, talent pool availability etc. that make things more complex. Usually CSCOs run multiple programs at the same time and form core teams for each initiative that own the bottom-line. One of the leading research companies writes about a concept called Supply chain center of excellence that is responsible for most of these activities that I am talking about, although, it might be possible only with companies that are big in scale and size. Additionally, I feel it is extremely difficult for anyone to monitor and make progress unless until there is a strong governance model in place. I have seen cross functional committees (business performance improvement councils etc) chaired by a CxO level person meeting regularly for periodical reviews and status checks.

 

This is all I wanted to share but this is, by no means, complete and exhaustive. I have probably touched a small portion of what all a CSCO has to manage.

I look forward to know your point of view in this regard and it will be great if you can share your experience. I know this is a broad topic so feel free to comment on any aspect of it.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.infosysblogs.com/apps/mt-tb.cgi/2601

Comments

What you are referring to in my opinion is the dilemma that all solution and consulting vendors face when approaching opportunities, in that each one is different. No Supply Chain is the same and canvassing 10 Supply Chain Directors will illicit 10 different sets of requirements, challenges and business objectives. This is actually a good thing for consultancies as well as software companies that have built multi-faceted solutions that are flexible, open and highly configurable. Kind regards Matthew @ Perceptant.com

I have found a great tool for issue identification is the SCOR model. The Supply Chain Council (SCC) has brought together practitioners from many industries to develop this model. It will clearly identify the major improvement opportunities. unfortunately, SCOR has no "fix it" tools, but SCC and many others have pointed to these tools (lean, six sigma, BPR, etc.). My experience is that many companies "find" issues in a piecemeal manner and then have a less than optimum process to pick the biggest bang for the buck. Using the SCOR model and process goes a long way to solving "best project" dilema.

Thanks Bruce and Matthew for posting your opinions. In know SCOR being used by organizations but not sure, if it helps in addressing 'issue identification' - do you have examples to cite here or share offline.

I have to agree with Bruce that the SCOR methodology, or variations of that methodology can provide an good way to identify and prioritize supply chain process needs.

Bob Ferrari

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Please key in the two words you see in the box to validate your identity as an authentic user and reduce spam.

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Follow us on

Blogger Profiles

Infosys on Twitter