The business world is being disrupted by the combined effects of growing emerging economies, shifts in global demographics, ubiquity of technology and accountability regulation. Infosys believes that to compete in the flat world, businesses must shift their operational priorities.

« Innovations in Retail Banking – Part 1 | Main | Innovations in Retail Banking – Part 2 »

Outsourcing Myths and Secrets

by Stephen Lane

I've been thinking about a recent Wall Street Journal article titled "Seven Myths About Outsourcing" (subscription may be required).  Basically, it is a cautionary tale that's been told many times in outsourcing circles.  Last year an outsourcing advisory firm also wrote a report along the lines of something like "the seven secrets of successful outsourcers".
 
Five years ago the authors could have written the same article about CRM and before that ERP.  We all know quite well that every business/IT trend follows the same path.  Gartner hit the nail on the head when they came up with their Hype Cycle.

True, vendors sometimes over-promise, but the problems in many outsourcing cases are due to failure to properly plan by the outsourcer -- that and a lack of dedicated program management.  Many first time outsourcers jump onto the bandwagon with visions of huge cost savings.  What they fail to realize is that if they don't have a good sense of their internal operations, they won't know what they are outsourcing and can't manage it well enough to get the desired savings. 
 
The moral of the story is that outsourcing is a strategic activity, one that requires planning, partnering, and a strong sense of internal processes and costs.  It also requires executive leadership, stakeholder buy-in, and dedicated ongoing management, which is the same for any strategic undertaking.  In raising these points the article is actually quite positive.  If anything, we and the other offshore vendors should be thanking the authors for pointing out what to most experienced outsourcing practitioners is obvious. 

The main problem that I have with the WSJ article is that it follows the recent trend of using the terms outsourcing and offshore interchangably.  The same myths have been and continue to be applied to domestic outsourcing, e.g., the old "your mess for less" approach that led to headlines a couple of years ago about dissatisfaction with outsourcing in general. 

True, the offshore approach does include a cultural wrinkle, which is one reason, but not the only reason why some our most advanced sourcing clients travel to India and other sourcing locations between 3-5 times annually to meet with us.  That kind of dedicated management and attention to relationships yields results.  So does experience, which is another point the authors make. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.infosysblogs.com/thinkflat-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/79

Comments

Stephen,
Great point about the terms outsourcing and offshore being used interchangeably by analysts and those in the media. This said, the trend is not really ‘recent’ . It dates back to the origin of offshoring when the media began interchanging the terms (something I even pointed out in a Computerworld essay two years ago)

When one wants to expand, or when work spills over or when costs can get lowered, one has to outsource - manufacturing, marketing, processes, analytics, CRM, etc. One outsources work when different perspectives are required. The relationship then can metamorphosize in to consulting too. That is why, outsourcing and consulting are closely related.

Hi Stephen,

I think the one question that organizations most often dont ask is Why Outsource. And I think the reason has to be more than to cut costs. While there are a number of ways to cut costs, Outsourcing is the obvious way.

Thanks, Atul.

Hi Stephen,
I did read about the article on Outsourcing myths on WSJ. I feel that today costs are no longer a unique selling point. what makes a difference is the quality of work. I might save 80% of my cost but if this activity does not yield me the desired result then that cost factor becomes obsolete. Would request thoughts or comments on it.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)