The Infosys Utilities Blog seeks to discuss and answer the industry’s burning Smart Grid questions through the commentary of the industry’s leading Smart Grid and Sustainability experts. This blogging community offers a rich source of fresh new ideas on the planning, design and implementation of solutions for the utility industry of tomorrow.

« Smart Grid - is it really relevant in India? | Main | The Importance of Vision During Implementation »

The Smart Customer Experience Mandate

Articulating the Smart Grid Value Proposition for Energy Consumers

Consumer Concerns about Smart Grid Technologies

In some parts of the U.S. energy consumers are pushing back on utilities' planned or actual rollout of Smart Meters for residential and small commercial customers (i.e. energy consumers). Consumers in northern California complained earlier this year about meter accuracy and high bills after PG&E installed Smart Meters in portions of its service territory. PG&E and the California Public Utility Commission had to hire an expensive consultant to verify PG&E's Smart Meter accuracy and the soundness of its billing practices in order to address consumer complaints and to restore (at least partially) consumer confidence in its Smart grid investments.

In other parts of the country, most recently in Maine, consumers are challenging the installation of Smart Meters on health, privacy, and public welfare concerns. Citizens of Scarborough, Maine are backing an emergency ordinance to stop the installation of Smart Meters in that town until Central Maine Power (CMP) proves definitively that their health and privacy concerns are addressed satisfactorily. Elisa Boxer-Cook, a Scarborough resident leading the dissent says: "Show me peer-reviewed studies that there are no health effects". She also says "I want them to not install one more antenna, one more meter, until the studies show people and their private information are safe." City and state public officials are currently lending support to the City of Scarborough's moratorium on the installation of Smart Meters. Central Maine Power is trying to be as responsive as possible to Scarborough residents' concerns, including temporarily allowing those who are concerned to opt out of Smart Meter installation for their homes.

The above examples show clearly that utilities need to anticipate consumer concerns about the rollout of Smart Grid technologies and to clearly articulate the Smart Grid value proposition for energy consumers. Failure to do so could undermine consumer confidence in utilities' Smart Grid programs and could even lead to its repeal and redaction by state public utility commissions.

Customer Experience Management: A Framework for Addressing Consumer Concerns and for Developing a Smart Grid Value Proposition for Consumers

What can utilities do to anticipate consumer concerns about Smart Grid technologies? What approach should they use to articulate a viable Smart Grid value proposition for energy consumers?

The following diagram illustrates a framework that Infosys recommends for anticipating consumer concerns about Smart Grid technologies, and for developing segment-specific value propositions for energy consumers:



Infosys believes that utilities must manage the customer experience for all key customer segments by designing and implementing the following processes/capabilities:

·         CRM Strategy

·         Customer Segmentation

·         Value Proposition (by customer segment)

·         Offers (for each segment)

·         CRM Capabilities

Utilities do not have much experience or expertise in developing value propositions for specific customer segments; up until recently, customer segmentation focused on the traditional residential, commercial, and industrial segmentation which ignores important differences within each classification. With the exception of the critical large commercial and industrial segment, which in most utilities has dedicated Account Managers and customer-specific offers, most utilities offered customers in the residential and commercial segments the same level of service whether it was needed, wanted, or made economic sense to do so.

Clearly, utilities need to sharpen their pencils to develop a CRM Strategy for customer segments based on segment-specific needs and wants rather than continue to provide a non-differentiated, uneconomic plain vanilla level of service to customers lumped into the traditional customer segment classifications. Utilities can and need to do better in meeting the needs of its customers, especially when introducing new AMI and Smart Grid services that come with a hefty price tag, and which have already raised health, safety, privacy, and economic concerns among these same customers.

In succeeding blogs, Infosys will describe the details of its recommended Customer Experience Management Framework and how utilities can leverage it to develop a CRM strategy and segment-specific value propositions and offers for energy consumers. Infosys will also identify and describe some of the critical CRM capabilities that utilities need to design, implement and manage the right customer experience for its key customer segments.

Without these capabilities, utilities increase the risk of its customers not embracing new AMI and Smart Grid services that may be justified from the utility perspective, but still need to be explained, articulated, and justified from the energy consumer perspective. If energy consumers do not "buy-in" to AMI and Smart Grid investments, utilities increase the risk of regulators not approving these investments for rate base treatment and subsequently, increase the risk of failure of their AMI/Smart Grid Program.


Larry, I look forward to Infosys' recommended Customer Experience Management Framework as part of utilities CRM strategy. When new meters were installed for our home in San Diego, I was curious to learn more about them, and the utility had no answers. I asked for instance: Is there storage in the meter, and how much? How often does it transmit data? Is the data parsed into usage type by appliance and by time of day? Who will the utility share the data with? Google? Microsoft? Do they plan to exchange consumption information for price breaks with advertisement support? What wireless protocol was being used and how secure is it? Is it possible for someone to monitor usage centrally and thereby assess how many users were in the home at any given time? None of this was available to me. While I am a supporter of Demand Response and its centralized management, I also believe the privacy concerns of folks from Maine are on target.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Please key in the two words you see in the box to validate your identity as an authentic user and reduce spam.